● B2B offer — Business start-up support

The AI agent for business start-ups: from the questionnaire to the single window

A founder spends more time hunting for information than building the project, and an adviser spends more time re-explaining the same rule than working on the business model. Your agent runs the questionnaire, fills in the business plan and forecast templates, prepares the single-window filing document by document, and keeps a checklist of start-up aid in which every line carries its official source and its date. Hosted in France, deployable under white label. General information — not legal advice; the adviser approves.

Free audit (15 min) → See the prices

Hosted in France Founders' files protected GDPR & AI Act: governed deployment The adviser approves

Updated on 07/09/2026

Live in two to four weeks

Start-up support · hosted in France

Léa Marchand's file is ready for your review. Questionnaire complete, three-year forecast built, single-window filing assembled with 7 documents out of 8 — the certificate of filiation is missing, and I asked her for it again yesterday.
And one calendar point I am flagging today rather than in three weeks: if she declares her start of activity on 1 October, the ACRE application must be filed with Urssaf within the following 60 days — the cut-off falls on 30 November.
⛓ Sourced · entreprendre.service-public.fr, ACRE page updated 01/07/2026 · urssaf.fr

Wasn't ACRE automatic?

It was, until 31 December 2025. Since 1 January 2026 the application must be filed with Urssaf, within 60 days of the declared start-of-activity date.
What I bring you to settle it: the text of the official page, its update date, the list of situations that open the entitlement and the application form. What is yours, and what I hand back to you in two minutes instead of two hours: establishing that she qualifies. Her eligibility depends on her personal circumstances — you establish it, you date it, you sign the support record.
✎ Framework · general information, sourced and dated — the adviser approves

Local inference · no data outside the EU

Data hosted in France

Sovereign by designLocal inference or hosting in France

GDPR & AI Act: governed deploymentTraceability & human supervision

TurnkeyDesigned, installed and run for you

The adviser approvesGeneral information, never personalised advice

✦ In brief

A Blue Lemon Agent start-up support agent runs a guided questionnaire with the founder, fills in the business plan and forecast templates while displaying every assumption and where it comes from, prepares the single-window filing document by document, and keeps a checklist of start-up aid in which every line carries its official source and its update date. It can be deployed under white label for a support network or an accountancy practice. Hosted in France, on local inference or an isolated resource, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity. General information — not legal advice; the adviser approves. Live in two to four weeks.

100 %

hosted in France in the target architecture

transfer outside the EU in the target architecture

capabilities ready to deploy, from questionnaire to registration

eligibility asserted without the adviser's approval

Benchmarks describing our offer, not results measured at a client. How much you gain on your own files is confirmed by a pilot on your own flow of founders.

The context

Why information has become the founder's first obstacle

Since 1 January 2023 every formality of creation, modification and cessation goes through the single electronic window operated by the INPI, the business formality centres having been abolished. The rule has been simplified; access to it remains a profession — and it keeps changing.

! The stake

A founder looks for information where it is most visible, rarely where it is accurate: forums, copied blog posts, undated articles. A support network does know the rule — but spends a considerable share of its time re-explaining it once per founder, chasing a missing document and catching up on a deadline already gone. And the law moves: ACRE, granted automatically until 31 December 2025, has since 1 January 2026 required an application to Urssaf within 60 days of the start of activity. A rule learned last year is a trap this year.

✓ Our answer

The agent takes on what repeats: the scoping questionnaire, the business plan and forecast templates with their assumptions on display, the assembly of the single-window filing document by document, and the aid checklist in which every line carries its official address and its update date. It works in general information: it brings the text, the date, the conditions to check — never the assertion that a given founder qualifies. Applying the rule to the case, judging whether a project stands up and signing the support record remain the adviser's work. It is that separation that makes the tool deployable under white label without exposing the network.

The decisive point

A founder's file is a personal file: sovereignty & compliance

Family circumstances, resources, employment history, a project not yet public: a start-up file concentrates personal data and a business project that nothing justifies exposing. Here is how our architecture protects them.

Local inference

The agent can run on a machine inside your organisation: no founder's file and no identity document leaves the network.

Hosting in France

Otherwise, a dedicated, isolated resource hosted in France under French law — your founders' files: processing and access within the European Union targeted by the architecture.

Reduced extraterritorial exposure

Architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity: a business project not yet filed stays out of reach, including from a US host based in Europe.

General information, never advice

Every rule is returned with its official address, the update date of that page, and the list of conditions to check. Applying it to the founder's case is the adviser's, who signs it.

Partitioned white label

Deployed in the colours of your network or your practice, with your templates and your vocabulary. One organisation's files are never visible from another.

AI Act: governed deployment

Strictly a support agent; no eligibility asserted, no document handed to a founder without approval; traceability and human supervision end to end.

What depends on the architecture chosen These points are not general guarantees: they are settled deployment by deployment, in the quotation.

The applicable location is that of the architecture set out in the quotation and verified before commissioning.
Local execution is announced only for the configuration explicitly described and accepted in the quotation.
The applicable isolation depends on the deployment mode set out in the quotation; no dedicated isolation is presumed.

For publicly funded bodies that archive identity documents and proof of resources, SecNumCloud and retention periods configured per document category are available. A single architecture is designed to answer both the GDPR and extraterritorial exposure. Designed for deployment in line with the GDPR and the AI Act, after the processing, roles and context-specific risks have been assessed.

Demonstration

See the agent at work

4 real situations, taken from those that come up most often. Pick one: the exchange unfolds as it would in your organisation.

A scripted demonstration. These exchanges show how the agent behaves — its sources, its refusals, what it leaves to your teams. Nothing is sent from this page, no model is queried here, and the matters named are fictional. That is precisely what we promise your data.
The behaviours shown here — monitoring, automation rules, routing and reminders — are configured with you during deployment, from your tools, your rules and your thresholds.
The architecture points named in these exchanges — location, local execution, isolation, encryption, role-based access, logging — are not a guarantee attached to the demonstration: they are those of the architecture set out in your quotation, and verified before commissioning.

The company in this demonstration

Fictional company

Élan Entreprendre — an association supporting business start-ups and takeovers

Sector: Publicly funded start-up and takeover support, including two partners served under white label
Headcount: 31 staff, including 9 start-up advisers and 2 funding officers
Public served: Founders and buyers in a rural département and its main city, 640 supported a year
Order of magnitude: 3 meetings per founder on average, 11 weeks from the first meeting to registration
Tools in place: A founder-tracking tool, an in-house template library, the INPI single window, the Urssaf portal
Who decides: The start-up adviser approves every document handed to a founder and signs the support record
Room for improvement: Of 640 files, 128 came back at least once for a missing document and 41 founders let the ACRE application window lapse

Élan Entreprendre supports 640 founders a year with nine advisers, and additionally serves two partners under their own brands. Advisers spend a large share of their meetings re-explaining rules that are identical from one file to the next, while files go backwards for a missing document. The agent is connected to the founder-tracking tool, to the template library and to the official sources; it prepares, it dates and it sources. No document reaches a founder without an adviser's approval, and their name is on it.

This company, its figures and the exchanges that follow were invented for the demonstration. They illustrate a common situation; they describe no real client.

Start-up support · hosted in France

I reread your 640 files for the year. Your 41 lapsed ACRE windows are not spread at random: 34 of them concern founders who declared their start of activity BETWEEN two meetings — that is, out of your sight.
What I counted:
· 128 files out of 640 came back at least once for a missing document — the most frequent being the certificate of filiation, 61 times.
· 41 founders let the ACRE application window lapse. Since 1 January 2026 that application is no longer automatic: it is filed with Urssaf within 60 days of the declared start-of-activity date.
· Average time from first meeting to registration: 11 weeks. Among the 128 files with a missing document: 16 weeks.
The gap that explains the 34: the founder leaves the second meeting, declares the activity three weeks later on the single window, and the third meeting falls beyond the 60th day. Nobody forgot anything: the clock started outside your calendar.
My proposal: that the scoping questionnaire record the intended start-of-activity date at the first meeting, that I calculate the 60-day cut-off and raise it to the adviser at D−45, D−15 and D−5. The rule is public; it was the calendar that was missing. diagnostic_640-files.pdf128 missing documents, 41 ACRE windows lapsed
⛓ Sourced · 640 files from the tracking tool · entreprendre.service-public.fr, ACRE page updated 01/07/2026 · urssaf.fr

One more questionnaire — founders will not fill it in. What does it bring that is different?

It is not filled in by the founder alone in front of a screen: it is run, question after question, and it stops where it has nothing useful left to ask.
How it works: 38 questions in the catalogue, never 38 asked. The path branches on three forks — nature of the activity, whether employees are envisaged, and the founder's employment situation. A founder of a service activity with no employees sees 19; someone taking over a going concern sees 31.
What it records and your meetings were letting through:
· the intended start-of-activity date — the one that starts the 60-day clock;
· the founder's employment situation, which appears among the situations listed on the official ACRE page — I hand it back to you with the page and its date; it is you who establishes whether it opens the entitlement;
· the documents the formality will require, requested at the first meeting rather than at filing.
What the adviser receives: a one-page write-up, the answers ordered as in their own template, and the list of what is still missing.
What I measured by replaying it over your 640 files: the certificate of filiation would have been requested at the first meeting in 61 files out of 61, and the ACRE cut-off would have been calculated in 612 files out of 640. The remaining 28 had no intended start-of-activity date at the first meeting — and for those I do not invent one: I ask again. guided-questionnaire_38-questions.pdf3 forks, 19 to 31 questions asked
⛓ Sourced · 640 files replayed, the association's templates, list of situations published on entreprendre.service-public.fr

Show me what it gives on a real file. Take Léa Marchand's.

A workshop repairing and selling refurbished bicycles, in a village centre. Your template is filled across its eleven sections, and the forecast is built over three years — every line carrying the assumption behind it and where it comes from.
What comes from her, as she said it: 4 opening days a week, a capacity of 12 repairs a day stated from her experience as an employee, a share of refurbished-bicycle sales estimated at a third of the activity, and premises she has found and whose rent she knows.
What comes from your own files: the ramp-up period. Across your 37 specialist retail files supported over three years, the activity reaches its cruising level in the 9th month in median, not the 3rd. I have therefore written 9 months, flagged as an assumption drawn from your cohort and not from her project.
What comes from an official source: the rates and thresholds of the regime under consideration, with the address of the page and its update date.
What I have not filled in: two boxes stay empty — the pay she wishes to draw and the capital she is prepared to put in. Those are decisions, not data; they are taken in front of you.
And one qualification point to look into: certain repair activities require a professional qualification. I bring you the official page listing the activities concerned, and its date; establishing whether Léa Marchand's falls within it is yours — and it changes the documents in the filing. business-plan_template-filled-11-sections.pdf11 sections, 2 boxes deliberately left empty
⛓ Sourced · questionnaire of 12/09, the association's template, 37 files in the same activity family, dated official pages

Does her first year hold up or not? That is the question she will ask me.

I will not answer « I do not know »: I give you the two comparisons that let you settle it, and the point where the gap lies.
First comparison — your own cohort. Across your 37 specialist retail files, the first year reaches 62 % of the cruising level in median. Léa Marchand's assumption aims at 81 % — 19 points above your median, and above 31 of your 37 files.
Second comparison — her own project, reduced to volume. Her break-even, as her costs give it, falls at 41 repairs a week. Her assumption plans 34 in the third month and 48 in the sixth. In other words: she spends about four months below break-even, and her cash-flow plan does not write that down.
Where the gap comes from, precisely: not from her repair volume, which is consistent with her stated capacity of 12 a day over 4 days. It comes from the ramp-up period: she wrote it over 3 months, your cohort gives 9.
The test I propose putting to her: rebuild the same forecast with your cohort's ramp-up, and see whether the four months below break-even become seven. Two versions side by side is a conversation; a single table is a verdict.
And the line I do not cross: concluding that the project holds up, or that it does not, is your judgement and your signature. I hand you the arithmetic, the two comparisons, the origin of every assumption and the test that settles it — you decide in ten minutes instead of an evening. forecast_assumptions-and-cohort-comparison.pdfBreak-even at 41 repairs a week, 2 scenarios
⛓ Sourced · 37 files in the same activity family, costs stated by the founder, capacity stated in the questionnaire

Léa Marchand's filing is assembled with 7 documents out of 8. The certificate of filiation is missing, and I asked her for it again yesterday — it is the document that sent 61 of your files backwards last year.
What the single window expects for this formality: since 1 January 2023, the formalities of creation, modification and cessation of activity must be carried out online on the single electronic window operated by the INPI, whatever the legal form or the activity; the business formality centres have been abolished. Until every required document is supplied, the declaration cannot be filed — hence the interest in gathering them beforehand, not during.
State of play, document by document:
· valid identity document — received, legible, not expired;
· sworn declaration of non-conviction — received, dated and signed;
· certificate of filiation — missing, chaser sent on the 18th;
· proof of right to occupy the premises — received;
· the four documents specific to the activity and the legal form chosen — received.
What I checked, and it is not a reading of file names: the expiry date on the identity document, the presence of a handwritten signature on the sworn declaration, and that the name matches across the four documents. A document that is present but expired blocks the filing exactly like a missing one. single-window_filing-and-documents.pdf7 documents of 8, 3 substantive checks passed
⛓ Sourced · list of documents published by the single window for this formality · entreprendre.service-public.fr, « single window for business formalities » page verified 23/01/2025

ACRE — give me the exact rule again. I do not want to get it wrong in front of her.

Here is the text, its source and its date — and the part that is yours, clearly separated.
What changed: until 31 December 2025 no formality was needed and the aid was granted automatically. Since 1 January 2026 the application must be filed with Urssaf.
The window: 60 days from the start-of-activity date. Léa Marchand is aiming at 1 October: the cut-off therefore falls on 30 November, and I will raise it at D−45, D−15 and D−5.
What Urssaf's silence produces: no answer within one month means the aid is deemed granted. That is worth telling the founder, who would otherwise chase into the void.
How long the relief lasts: 12 months of partial relief on personal social contributions in the general case. For a micro-entrepreneur the logic differs: the contribution rate is reduced until the end of the 3rd calendar quarter following the declared start-of-activity date. Léa Marchand's regime is not settled yet: I give you both, and you will keep only one.
The situations that open the entitlement are listed exhaustively on the official page — jobseeker with or without benefit subject to duration conditions, recipient of income support or of the specific solidarity allowance, person under 26, creation in certain neighbourhoods or zones, among others. I hand you the full and current list; establishing that Léa Marchand falls within one of them, recording it in the file and dating it, is yours. I never write « eligible » in your place — and that is precisely what makes your attestation stand up. acre_conditions-window-and-sources.pdf60 days, one month's silence meaning consent, 2 regimes
⛓ Sourced · entreprendre.service-public.fr, ACRE page updated 01/07/2026 · urssaf.fr, news item « Acre: new rules and procedures from 1 January 2026 »

And the other schemes? We are always accused of missing one.

You rarely miss one: what you do not have is the dated proof that the list was current on the day you handed it over. That is exactly what I manufacture.
How the checklist is built: every line carries the official address it is drawn from, the update date of that page, the conditions to check and what is left for you to establish. No line says « you are entitled to this ».
Where I look: the pages of service-public.fr and entreprendre.service-public.fr for national schemes, urssaf.fr for anything touching contributions, the France Num aid search engine and aides-territoires.beta.gouv.fr for regional and local schemes, which change most often.
What I revisit and what I flag: I reread those pages every week and raise the ones whose update date has moved since you last handed a list to a founder. This month: 3 pages moved out of the 34 I follow, one of them affecting 12 of your live files — you have the list of the 12.
And what it is worth under white label: your two partners receive the same checklist, in their own colours, with the same dates. When a page changes, it changes for all three the same day.
What it is worth the day a founder disputes something: you pull out the exact version handed over on 14 March, with the dates of the official pages as of that day, and the name of the adviser who approved it. A list that is correct but undated proves nothing; a dated and sourced list does. aid-checklist_sourced-and-dated.pdf34 pages followed, 3 moved this month
⛓ Sourced · service-public.fr · entreprendre.service-public.fr · urssaf.fr · francenum.gouv.fr · aides-territoires.beta.gouv.fr

Two months. What does it really change for my nine advisers?

The repetitive preparation time on a file has gone from 2 h 40 to 45 minutes. Over 112 founders supported in two months, that is 214 hours returned — more than six working weeks, on a 35-hour base.
The figures I always report together:
· Files sent back for a missing document: 3 out of 112, against 20 % last year.
· Time from first meeting to registration: 11 weeks → 7 weeks.
· ACRE windows lapsed: 0 out of 41 affected files, with 41 cut-offs calculated and 123 reminders raised.
· Meetings spent on the business model rather than on procedure: 1.1 per founder → 2.3. That is the figure that describes your profession; the others describe the machinery.
And the figure that does not flatter me: of 96 forecasts built, 22 had at least one assumption corrected by an adviser — 22 %.
What I looked at to understand: 19 of the 22 corrections concern the same assumption — the ramp-up period. I was taking it from the mean of the cohort; yet on cohorts of 20 to 40 files, two very fast successes pull the mean up and describe the median file badly. Your advisers were correcting downwards, and they were right.
What I propose: switch to the median on every activity family with fewer than 50 files, and measure again next month. Target written in advance: below 12 % corrections. If the figure does not fall, it is not the statistic that is at fault but my grouping of activity families, and I will redo it another way. review_two-months-and-white-label.pdf214 h returned, 22 % of assumptions corrected
⛓ Sourced · founder-tracking tool, adviser approval log, assumption correction log

And our two white-label partners? I do not want an Élan file turning up with them, or the other way round.

Three organisations, three spaces that cannot see each other — and I give you the means to check it yourself rather than take my word.
Partitioning, concretely: each organisation has its own space, its templates, its vocabulary and its approval rules. A search launched from a partner returns no file belonging to another organisation — not as a result, not as a suggestion, not as an example. What is common is what is public: the official pages, their dates, the aid checklist.
What you can check: the access log is per organisation and readable by its manager. Over the two months: 0 cross-organisation accesses, which is read in the log and not only in a contract.
What is automatic, and undoes itself: three actions only — chasing a missing document on the calendar you set, recalculating a cut-off date when a founder changes their start-of-activity date, and flagging an official page whose update date has moved. Each is logged, each stops with a word.
What is never automatic: handing a document to a founder, writing « eligible », recommending a legal form or a tax regime, concluding on whether a project stands up. Every document handed over carries the name of the adviser who approved it and the date of that approval — that is what protects you the day the support record is questioned, and it is also what your funders ask for.
And the base: files, identity documents, supporting papers and I myself are hosted in France, on local inference or an isolated resource, with the deployment objective of processing and access operated within the European Union and an architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity. Retention periods are set per document category, and a project not yet filed is used to train no model. framework_white-label-and-adviser-signature.pdf3 partitioned spaces, 3 reversible automatic actions
⛓ Sourced · per-organisation access logs, approval log, retention policy per document category

Local inference · no data outside the EU

Your case is not here? That is exactly what a 15-minute conversation is for. Book the free audit →

Use cases

What the agent actually does, from the first meeting to registration

Each use corresponds to a capability we configure with you, on your own templates. All of them work in support: the adviser approves.

Included in your agent The 7 capabilities essential to this promise are included, at no extra cost.

From 580 € excl. VAT / month

Guided questionnaire

Project scoping run question by question, chasing what is missing — and the write-up ready for the adviser.

Business plan template

Your own template filled in with the founder's answers, section by section, with no blank page.

Forecast with assumptions on display

Every line carries the assumption that produces it and where it comes from; no projection is shown without its basis.

Single-window filing

The documents the formality requires listed, chased, checked and assembled before filing on formalites.entreprises.gouv.fr.

Deadlines that cannot be caught up

The 60-day ACRE application window and the other dates with irreversible effect, calculated and flagged before they fall.

Sourced and dated aid checklist

National and regional schemes, each with its official address, its update date and its conditions to check.

White label for a network

In the colours of your chamber of commerce, chamber of trades, support association, incubator or practice, with your templates — and strict partitioning between organisations.

Controls and safeguards These 3 controls are built into the agent: they frame what it does, whatever plan you pick. They are not chosen and are not added to your order.

Human validation, exceptions and escalation Status, safe closure and audit trail Data protection, rights and human oversight

What the agent must be connected to This connection is required for the agent to work. It concerns your information system and is scoped during the audit.

Integration with existing tools without double entry

Need to go further?

These agents handle a different business process, with their own owner and their own price. They are added to this one.

The network's document memory

Instantly retrieve a template, an internal guidance note or an earlier file.

Document agent (FAQ, knowledge base) from 678 € excl. VAT / month Knowledge base →

Public tender watch

For founders targeting public procurement, a dedicated agent monitors the notices.

Tender watch assistant from 454 € excl. VAT / month Tender watch →

Does your need fall outside this?

In 15 minutes we identify the most relevant agent — without oversizing the project.

Book the free audit → Build your agent

The gain

How much time per start-up file?

By taking on the questionnaire, the formatting of the forecast, the chasing of documents and the upkeep of the aid checklist, the agent returns to the adviser the time for the business model. Actual gains depend on your volume of founders and the variety of legal forms you support.

Scoping the project and collecting information

Today · in meetings

Questionnaire run, write-up ready

Formatting the business plan and forecast

Today · done by hand

Template filled, assumptions on display

Assembling and chasing filing documents

Today · by successive chasers

Documents listed, chased, checked

Keeping the aid documentation current

Today · irregular

Sourced and dated checklist

A qualitative, non-contractual comparison: the proportions shown illustrate how the work shifts towards the support itself, they represent no measurement. Every output of the agent is reviewed and approved by a competent adviser, the only person entitled to apply a rule to a founder's case.

How it works

The stages of your AI agent project

Audit & scoping

15 minutes to target the use case with the best return.

Quote or direct sign-up

A catalogue offer is bought online; a specific need gets a costed quote.

Design

We design the agent and its guardrails.

Integration & testing

We connect your tools to the agent, which is itself hosted in France.

Rollout

Going live and training your team.

Operation

Continuous supervision and improvement.

Pricing

A start-up support agent, installed and run for you

An agent built on your templates and your vocabulary, connected to your founder-tracking tool, deployable under white label. Prices excluding VAT — annual subscription, the time it takes for the gains to settle.

Agility

Setup + controlled subscription

6,480 € ^{excl. VAT} setup

then 580 € ^{excl. VAT}/month — you invest at installation and pay a reduced subscription. Ideal for keeping the cost under control over time.

Installation, configuration and training for your teams
Operation, human oversight, updates and support
Sovereign hosting in France, a dedicated and isolated resource

Order →

The simplest Serenity

All inclusive, no setup fee

940 € ^{excl. VAT} /month

all inclusive, immediate start. No upfront investment: a single subscription. Ideal for starting quickly and simply.

Setup included (installation, configuration, training)
Operation, human oversight, updates and support
Sovereign hosting in France, managed end to end

Order →

100% Sovereign

On site, you own it

10,240 € ^{excl. VAT} setup

then 777 € ^{excl. VAT}/month · + hardware from 2,491 € (one-off purchase, in addition) — a sovereign computer installed on your premises, maintained remotely. Models run locally, your data returned at the end of the contract. 36-month commitment.

Hardware installed on your premises (you own it)
French / European AI models run locally
Secure remote maintenance (Pro support included)

Order →

Not included in the packages: AI consumption (model tokens), re-invoiced at real cost with no margin, and tracked in real time in your client area. Maintenance and supervision subscription for an initial term of 12 months for the Agility package, 24 months for the Serenity package and 36 months for the 100% Sovereign package, renewable; support levels (SLA 72 h / 24 h / 4 h) optional. Bespoke development, additional integrations or exceptional volumes are quoted separately. Support Monday to Friday, 9am to 6pm. Prices exclude VAT.

AI model: none of the AI models offered currently carries a fixed surcharge. When the selected model carries a cost, that cost is shown when you choose it, before you order, and re-invoiced at the cost incurred, with no mark-up; usage is billed at the publisher's price. Publishers' prices are published in US dollars: the amount re-invoiced is the amount in euros actually borne by Blue Lemon Agent on the publisher's invoice, at that invoice's exchange rate, with no commission or mark-up.

Included components and additional components Components included in the base offer: the Blue Lemon Agent software foundation, the AI models listed in the order journey, the standard channels (Microsoft Teams, Slack, WhatsApp Business, email, website chat, calendars, Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace, file storage, market VoIP telephony, professional social-media pages and accounts, Google Business Profile), hosting in France for the package chosen, backups, supervision, updates and support. If adapting the AI agent to your constraints, your needs or your requests requires other paid components — a third-party publisher's software licence, paid API access to one of your applications, hosting of health data, for which French law requires an HDS-certified host (art. L. 1111-8 of the French Public Health Code), SecNumCloud-qualified hosting, a speech synthesis service, particular hardware —, they are offered to you as an option or on quotation and re-invoiced at the cost incurred; nothing is committed without your written agreement. Where the artificial intelligence model you choose entails an additional cost, that cost is shown to you before you order and re-invoiced to you at the cost incurred, with no margin.

What to expect

Go-live 2 to 3 weeks

Agent designed, channels connected, team trained.

Steady state 4 to 7 weeks

After a few weeks of real use, once the agent's behaviour matches what you expect. Indicative estimate, adjusted to the options you keep. It is not a delivery commitment.

See the full price list →

Estimate my gains in 1 minute →

Our commitment

Four guarantees that matter for a support network

General information, never personalised adviceThe agent returns the rule with its official source, its date and its conditions to check. It asserts no eligibility and qualifies no individual situation: the adviser approves and signs.

Founders' files stay with youLocal inference or an isolated resource hosted in France; no identity document, no unfiled project entrusted to a foreign third party, no content used to train a model.

Data in France, under French lawFiles, documents and forecasts: minimisation, configured retention periods and location in France, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity.

Human supervision & traceabilityEvery document handed to a founder carries the name of the adviser who approved it and the date of that approval, as the AI Act requires.

Going further

Related resources

AI agents for business →Our full offer Sovereign AI hosted in France →Our confidentiality commitment France Num: the free entry point →Diagnostic, activators, aid search engine

Frequently asked questions

Your questions, our answers

Does the agent give legal or tax advice?

No, and that is the rule everything else is built on. It returns general information: the applicable text, the official address where it is found, the update date of that page, and the list of conditions to check. It never asserts that a given founder meets those conditions, does not recommend a legal form or a tax regime, and does not pronounce on whether a project stands up. Applying the rule to the case and signing the support record belong to the adviser.

How does the agent stay current when a rule changes?

Every line of the checklist carries the official address it is drawn from and the update date of that page; the agent revisits them and flags the pages that have moved since it last read them. ACRE illustrates the point: granted automatically until 31 December 2025, it has since 1 January 2026 required an application to Urssaf within 60 days of the declared start-of-activity date. An undated checklist would have gone on announcing that it was automatic.

Where are formalities filed?

On the single electronic window for business formalities, operated by the INPI. Since 1 January 2023 the formalities of creation, modification and cessation of activity must be carried out there online, whatever the legal form or the activity; the business formality centres have been abolished. The agent prepares and checks the filing — identity document, declaration of non-conviction and certificate of filiation, proof of business address, proof of professional qualification for a regulated activity — and then a human files it.

Does the forecast produced commit our organisation?

The forecast is a formatting of the founder's assumptions, and every line displays the assumption behind it and where it comes from. The agent compares those assumptions with the files your organisation has already supported in the same activity, and flags the gaps. It does not validate a funding plan and does not conclude that a project stands up: the adviser judges that and signs the document handed over.

Is white label possible?

Yes. The agent is deployed in the colours of your network — chamber of commerce, chamber of trades, support association, incubator, business nursery — or of your practice, with your templates, your vocabulary and your approval rules. Partitioning is strict: one organisation's files are never visible from another, and every document handed over carries the name of the adviser who approved it.

Is founders' data protected?

Yes. The agent is hosted in France, on local inference or an isolated resource, with the deployment objective of processing and access operated within the European Union and an architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity, in compliance with the GDPR. Identity documents and proof of resources have retention periods configured per category, and the files are not used to train a third-party model.

How long does deployment take?

Two to four weeks depending on the connections (founder-tracking tool, template library, official sources to monitor), after a free audit that scopes the perimeter, then a design, integration and testing phase before go-live.

Related use cases

Other agents to support a young company

Quote generation →The first quotes of a brand-new company Knowledge base →The network's document memory Tender watch →For founders targeting public procurement

Let's talk

Let us size the potential on your flow of founders

15 minutes to scope your file volume, your templates and your white-label needs — hosted in France, supervised, no commitment.

Free audit (15 min) → Write to us