An orchestration agent, scoped with you before it is priced. This agent coordinates several specialised agents. Its orchestration follows your actual workflows — which is why it is scoped with you rather than bought off the shelf. We establish the scope together, then the quotation commits it. The journeys described below form the scope that this review refines and the quotation commits. The specialised agents it coordinates can be ordered today. Request a quote

● Business offer — Industry & production

The AI agent for industry: find the right procedure, keep production flowing

On a production line, lost time hides in the details: the procedure nobody can find, the drawing whose revision is no longer certain, the spare part impossible to identify, the customer calling back about a manual. Your AI agent absorbs those searches and repetitive answers. Hosted in France — on local inference or an isolated resource — your drawings, process sheets and know-how stay in the factory. The operator and the management keep the decision.

Free audit (15 min) → See the prices

Hosted in France Drawings & know-how protected GDPR & AI Act: governed deployment Human oversight

Updated on 15/09/2026

Deployed in a few weeks

Production assistant · hosted in France

On line 2, the operator reports a recurring sealing defect on part VP-450. What is the procedure, and have we had this before?

Procedure found: work instruction QUAL-VP-450 (revision C, in force). Tightening torque 18 Nm, seal ref. 7741-B, visual check + 6 bar pressure test.
History: 3 similar non-conformities in 14 months — all linked to a batch of out-of-tolerance seals. Suggested action: check the batch number of the seal fitted.
⛓ Sourced · quality document management + non-conformity history

It is indeed batch LJ-2274. Do we still have stock from that batch?

Batch LJ-2274: 1,240 parts still in stock, across 2 locations (store A and line 2 point of use). Recommendation: quarantine the batch and alert the supplier. I am preparing a pre-filled non-conformity record (part, batch, photos, procedure) — to complete and approve by the quality manager.
✎ Action · non-conformity record ready for review — quality approves

Local inference · no data outside the EU

Data hosted in France

Sovereign by designLocal inference or hosting in France

GDPR & AI Act: governed deploymentTraceability & human oversight

TurnkeyDesigned, installed and operated for you

The team decidesThe agent assists, never approves alone

✦ In brief

In a manufacturing company, a Blue Lemon Agent agent instantly finds the right procedure, the right drawing and the right revision, answers after-sales and customer questions, and automates repetitive tasks — technical documentation, support, supplier invoices, order administration. It runs on local inference or is hosted in France: your drawings, process sheets and know-how are never exposed to a foreign service, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity. The time saved goes back to production and quality. Live within a few weeks Your teams write to it from Microsoft Teams, Slack or their email, and your customers reach it on WhatsApp Business, your website chat or email — with no account to create and nothing to install. These connections are included in every plan, at no extra cost, within the number of connections your level includes.

100%

hosted in France in the target architecture

transfer outside the EU in the target architecture

uses ready to deploy on this scope

decision taken without human approval

Reference points describing our offer, not results measured at a client. The scale of the gain is confirmed by a pilot on your own scope.

The context

Why AI matters to industry — and why it hesitates

The technical information exists: it is in the document management system, the ERP, the drawings, the quality records. But it is scattered, sometimes out of date, and the right document often arrives too late. Yet the data involved — drawings, process sheets, patents, know-how — is at the heart of the company's competitiveness.

! The issue

The factory is caught between ever-rising demands on productivity and quality, and technical knowledge split between the document management system, the ERP, the drawings, the heads of long-serving staff and spreadsheets. Yet most consumer AI solutions amount to entrusting drawings, process sheets, bills of materials and industrial know-how to a third party, often hosted outside Europe and subject to the Cloud Act.

✓ Our answer

AI is only of interest to a manufacturer if it is sovereign and confidential by design. Local inference or an isolated resource hosted in France, systematic human oversight, decisions reserved to the teams: the time saved on finding information and on support is never paid for in exposed intellectual property. The aim is not to replace the operator or the design office, but to get them the right information, at the right moment.

The decisive point

Protecting drawings and know-how: sovereignty & compliance

A manufacturing company handles what it holds most precious: its drawings, its processes, its bills of materials. Here is how the architecture of our agents protects them, line by line.

Local inference

The agent can run on a machine in the factory: no drawing leaves the network, nothing passes through a cloud.

Hosting in France

Otherwise, a dedicated and isolated resource, hosted in France under French law — your data: processing and access within the European Union targeted by the architecture.

Reduced extraterritorial exposure

Exposure of drawings and know-how to the Cloud Act and FISA 702 is reduced by design; location alone does not guarantee immunity.

One isolated resource per site

No pooling of industrial data: an environment strictly dedicated to your company.

Encryption & controlled access

Encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access (RBAC), strong authentication and logging.

AI Act: governed deployment

An agent strictly in support; no action approved automatically; traceability and human oversight from end to end.

What depends on the architecture chosen These points are not general guarantees: they are settled deployment by deployment, in the quotation.

The applicable location is that of the architecture set out in the quotation and verified before commissioning.
Local execution is announced only for the configuration explicitly described and accepted in the quotation.
The applicable isolation depends on the deployment mode set out in the quotation; no dedicated isolation is presumed.
The encryption mechanisms in transit and at rest, their components and key management are those documented for the architecture chosen.
Roles and permissions are configured and accepted for the identities and systems actually connected.
The events logged, their content, their retention period and who may access them are defined for the deployment chosen.

For the most sensitive data (patents, strategic processes), SecNumCloud and reinforced hosting options are available depending on your requirements. A single architecture is designed to answer both the GDPR and extraterritorial exposure. Designed for deployment in line with the GDPR and the AI Act, after the processing, roles and context-specific risks have been assessed.

Demonstration

See the agent at work

4 real situations, taken from those that come up most often. Pick one: the exchange unfolds as it would in your organisation.

A scripted demonstration. These exchanges show how the agent behaves — its sources, its refusals, what it leaves to your teams. Nothing is sent from this page, no model is queried here, and the matters named are fictional. That is precisely what we promise your data.
The behaviours shown here — monitoring, automation rules, routing and reminders — are configured with you during deployment, from your tools, your rules and your thresholds.
The architecture points named in these exchanges — location, local execution, isolation, encryption, role-based access, logging — are not a guarantee attached to the demonstration: they are those of the architecture set out in your quotation, and verified before commissioning.

Production assistant · hosted in France

Four flags this morning, with no request from you.
· The vernier caliper at station 4 has been out of calibration for 12 days. 340 parts have been checked with it since.
· The drawing in use on the shop floor for part TR-118 is at issue B. The current issue has been D since March.
· A material batch on hold pending its certificate has been consumed on two works orders, on 03 and 05/08.
· A supplier amended a specification on its product sheet on 21/07, with no variation to your framework order. morning-watch_4-flags.pdf4 flags · parts and orders concerned
⛓ Source · instrument register, drawings and issues, material status, supplier sheets

The 340 parts — what do we do?

What I have prepared saves most of the time: the list is already split and traced.
340 parts, but not 340 decisions: they fall into 4 works orders and 3 part numbers. The call is made by batch, not by part.
What I could establish without assuming anything:
· 112 parts are still in stock — they can be re-inspected.
· 146 have gone to two customers, with the despatch note numbers.
· 82 are built into sub-assemblies still on site.
One thing that matters, and reassures: the last calibration record, of 14/05, was conforming with a 2 µm drift against a 30 µm tolerance. That is not a guarantee, it is a serious indication — and it heads the file.
The status decision stays with the quality manager, and it gets signed. The file reaches them complete. metrology_340-parts-traced.pdf4 orders · 3 part numbers · location of each batch
⛓ Source · works orders, despatch notes, last calibration record

How did you spot all that? And who do you tell?

I watch, continuously, what you have opened to me: calibration intervals across your instruments, drawing issues on the shop floor against those in the document system, material statuses and their consumption, your suppliers' sheets and your framework orders. An instrument out of interval, an issue diverging, held material moving, a specification changing — I say so, I do not wait to be asked.
Routing follows your organisation: calibration and the held batch to the quality manager, because those are status decisions; the drawing issue to engineering and the shop supervisor, both together; the supplier specification to purchasing, copied to quality.
With a chase: 12 h on calibration and the held batch — every shift adds parts to the scope; 48 h on the rest. Then a weekly summary to the site director: by subject, never by operator.

And I do not stop at the flag: the file is built before it arrives. The out-of-interval instrument goes out with the list of works orders inspected since its last valid date and the exact scope of the parts concerned; the held batch with its movement history, hour by hour; the drawing issue with both drawings side by side and the dimensions that differ, highlighted; the supplier specification with the version before and the version after. The quality manager no longer opens an investigation: they read a file and decide.
What stays a decision, and must: stopping a line, ruling on a batch status, amending a record. A batch status carries the name of whoever pronounced it — that is what makes it traceable in an audit and enforceable towards a customer. You rule, the record goes out with your sign-off, within the minute.
And I read what you have opened to me, station by station, every access logged and withdrawable on a word: nothing leaves the site.
✎ Proposal · watch and chases to be configured — you set the thresholds

Batch TR-118-0442 ships tomorrow morning. One line is missing on the inspection sheet — fill it with the usual values.

I cannot fill it, and here is something better: I can probably find it.
A "usual" value entered on an inspection sheet becomes a declared measurement. It is not inferred from an average — and if it is wrong, the whole sheet loses its value, not just that line.
What I looked for instead, and found: the missing dimension is the bore diameter. The measuring-bench report of 05/08 at 14:12 contains it, for all five parts of the sample, under the works order number. It simply was not carried across.
What I suggest: attach the bench report to the sheet, with the file reference and the timestamp. The line is filled by its source, which is worth more than a manual entry — including a correct one.
One signature remains to be applied, and it is not mine. inspection-sheet_TR-118-0442.pdfLine recovered · timestamped source
⛓ Source · bench report of 05/08, works order TR-118-0442

And if the report had contained nothing?

Then I would have told you a measurement is missing, and suggested redoing it — three minutes at the bench.
On this batch, 112 parts are still in stock: the sample can be redone without touching the despatch plan, provided it is done tonight rather than at 7 am tomorrow.
The expensive part is not the missing measurement: it is noticing it as the lorry is being loaded.

A proposal, if you approve it: every inspection sheet is matched against its works order's bench reports at closure, not at despatch. An empty line whose measurement exists is filled by its source; an empty line with no measurement is flagged to the inspector, with the time remaining before despatch.
No sheet is signed, no batch is released, no value is estimated. Over the last six months, that matching would have recovered 31 lines out of 34 — and flagged the other three two days earlier. missing-lines_6-months.pdf34 lines · 31 recoverable from their source
✎ Proposal · matching at closure — the signature stays with the inspector

A customer is complaining about a sealing defect. They want to know what we shipped and whether other parts are affected.

Both answers are in your data, and I have traced them back to the raw material.
What was shipped: despatch note BL-2026-3318 of 12/06, 240 TR-118 parts, from works order 0417, itself built with seals from batch 7741-B/2603.
What else that seal batch fed: three other works orders, 620 parts, delivered to four customers between 02/06 and 18/07. Two of them have reported nothing.
What I do not conclude: that the seal is the cause. A sealing defect can come from the seal, the tightening torque, the surface finish or assembly at the customer's end. All four are open, and traceability does not choose between them.
What would move the diagnosis forward, and I can prepare: a comparison of the tightening parameters recorded on the four works orders. Two of them ran on a different driver. traceability_batch-7741-B-2603.pdf4 orders · 860 parts · 5 customers
⛓ Source · despatch notes, works orders, material batches, tightening records

Compare the tightening parameters then.

Comparison done, and it gives a lead without giving a conclusion.
All four orders ran within tolerance — specified torque 18 Nm ± 2. But their distributions do not match:
· Orders 0417 and 0421, driver no. 2: mean 16.4 Nm, 18% of points below 16.5.
· Orders 0429 and 0436, driver no. 1: mean 18.1 Nm, tight distribution.
The two orders complained about are the driver no. 2 ones. That is one more coincidence, not proof — but it is checkable in an hour on the bench.
What I have written to turn it into proof or rule it out: the test protocol — thirty parts, fifteen per driver, same material, same operator, same sequence — and the conclusion criterion set in advance: if driver no. 2 is the cause, the expected difference in mean is 1.7 Nm, and it is measurable in an hour. The bench is free at 14:00.
Why the customer does not yet have a cause: a cause announced and then withdrawn costs more than a delay in answering. What they get instead holds better: an exact scope, a dated test, and a criterion that will say yes or no.

What I have prepared for them, and it holds today: the acknowledgement, the full traceability of their batch, the exact scope of the parts concerned, and a commitment to come back within 5 working days. A customer given the exact scope waits better than a customer promised a cause. tightening-comparison_4-orders.pdf2 drivers · distributions compared
✎ Support · pattern documented — the diagnosis stays with engineering

Check this month's supplier invoices before payment.

128 invoices matched against orders and receipts. 122 are clean.
Six gaps, and the most interesting is not the largest:
· Verne Composants billed €3,240 above the order: two lines added with no variation.
· Kane Traitement billed for work with no goods receipt at all.
· Halbran Matières billed the right price — but on a specification amended on 21/07, with no variation to your framework order. The price has not moved; the product has.
· Three minor gaps, roundings below the €5 threshold.
The third is the only one that costs nothing this month and can cost a lot later: a material whose specification changes without the framework order following means a product qualification that no longer covers what is delivered. invoice-check_6-gaps.pdf128 invoices · 3 kinds of gap
⛓ Source · 128 invoices, orders, receipts, supplier product sheets

The changed specification — is that serious?

I will give you what is established, and you will see the question settles quickly.
What changed, line by line: the product sheet of 21/07 amends the stated hardness, from 72 to 68 Shore A. The rest is identical.
What your qualification file says: the 2023 sealing test was run at 72 Shore A, and the report names it as an input parameter.
What I do not know: whether 68 changes anything. That is a question for engineering, not for supplier accounting — and it is asked once, not at every delivery.
What I have prepared: the question to the supplier (is this a change or a sheet correction?) and the extract of the qualification file, for engineering.

And a proposal that goes further: I can compare every supplier product sheet against the one in force at qualification, and flag any parameter divergence — even when the price does not move. That is precisely the case where nothing raises an alert today: the invoice is right, the receipt is conforming, and only the product has changed. specification_Halbran_before-after.pdf1 parameter amended · qualification extract
✎ Action · supplier question ready · the technical view stays with engineering

Local inference · no data outside the EU

Your case is not here? That is exactly what a 15-minute conversation is for. Book the free audit →

Use cases

The uses of AI in industry & production

Each use corresponds to an agent we deploy. All of them work in support, subject to approval by your teams.

Included in your agent The 2 capabilities essential to this promise are included, at no extra cost.

Technical documentation & quality

Instantly find the right procedure, the right drawing, the right revision, a quality record or a manual across the whole document management system.

After-sales & customer support

Answering recurring requests: part numbers, manuals, warranties, status of an order or a repair.

Controls and safeguards These 2 controls are built into the agent: they frame what it does, whatever plan you pick. They are not chosen and are not added to your order.

Human oversight, costs, quality, incidents and safe stop Explain alerts, scenarios and operational trade-offs

What the agent must be connected to These 3 connections are required for the agent to work. They concern your information system and are scoped during the audit.

Handoff contracts, least-privilege permissions and shared context Connect ERP/WMS/MES/IoT without creating double entry Honour constraints, statuses, approvals and error recovery

Other needs our agents cover Each card says where the matching agent stands: available, on quote, or still being architected.

HR & onboarding

Answering the teams' everyday questions (leave, job descriptions, safety) and supporting new operators as they settle in.

On quote View the agent page →

Need to go further?

These agents handle a different business process, with their own owner and their own price. They are added to this one.

Chasing unpaid invoices

Chasing late customer payments in multichannel sequences, without letting the company's cash flow slip.

Debt collection agent (multichannel sequences) from 587 € excl. VAT / month Debt recovery →

Qualifying incoming requests

Qualifying quote requests and contact enquiries, and automatically scheduling sales or technical meetings.

Lead qualification / appointment booking agent from 602 € excl. VAT / month Qualification & appointments →

Tender responses

Finding the technical material, writing the submissions and assembling the documents to respond faster to tenders.

Tender response agent (drafting) from 684 € excl. VAT / month Tenders →

AI agent for technical support & documentation

Technical support answers the same questions a hundred times, and the documentation always falls behind the code.

Technical support & documentation from 664 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →

Quality tracking

A non-conformity is worth what is done with it: a clear finding, a cause looked for, a corrective action and a check that it worked.

Quality agent (non-conformity tracking) from 532 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →

Level 2 customer support

A level 2 incident is rarely unresolved for want of expertise: it is resolved slowly because reconstructing the context takes time.

Tier-2 customer support agent (diagnosis) from 574 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →

AI agent for invoice processing

Entering, matching, getting approval, paying: processing supplier invoices is a repetitive, high-volume process that invites mistakes.

Automated invoice processing agent (P2P) from 981 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →

Purchasing and suppliers

Approaching several suppliers takes discipline: writing the same enquiry for each one, chasing those who are slow, then bringing offers in different formats onto a single basis.

Purchasing / supplier agent (quotes, follow-ups) from 504 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →

AI sales & CRM agent

Every salesperson knows it: the CRM is never really up to date.

Sales agent (meeting notes, follow-ups, CRM) from 592 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →

Does your need fall outside this?

In 15 minutes we identify the most relevant agent — without oversizing the project.

Book the free audit → Build your agent

The gain

How much time can a factory win back?

By making technical documentation findable in seconds and absorbing repetitive answers, an industrial site can aim for a noticeable reduction in time lost searching for information and on support — reinvested in production and quality.

Finding the right up-to-date procedure / drawing

Today · done by hand

Prepared by the agent, to approve

Answering a recurring after-sales request

Today · done by hand

Automatic

Checking a batch of supplier invoices

Today · done by hand

Prepared by the agent, to approve

Qualitative, non-contractual comparison: the proportions shown illustrate the shift of the work towards review, they represent no measurement. Every output of the agent is reviewed and approved by a competent person.

How it works

The stages of your AI agent project

Audit & scoping

15 minutes to target the use case with the best return.

Quote or direct sign-up

A catalogue offer is bought online; a specific need gets a costed quote.

Design

We design the agent and its guardrails.

Integration & testing

We connect your tools to the agent, which is itself hosted in France.

Rollout

Going live and training your team.

Operation

Continuous supervision and improvement.

Pricing

Three options, one agent

A document agent (procedures, drawings, quality, support), installed and operated for you. Choose according to how you work. Prices exclude VAT — annual subscription, the time it takes for the gains to settle in.

This agent is priced with you, not online. We are adjusting its scope at the moment, and online subscription stays closed while we do. Tell us what you need: we will come back to you with a price. Request a quote

See the full price list →

Estimate my gains in 1 minute →

Our commitment

Four guarantees that matter to a manufacturer

Drawings and know-how never leave the factoryLocal inference or an isolated resource hosted in France; no technical document entrusted to a foreign third party.

Data in France, under French lawDeployment objective: processing and access within the European Union for drawings and know-how; architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity.

Your teams keep the decisionThe agent finds, proposes and prepares verifiable material; no critical action is automated.

Human oversight & traceabilityFor technical documentation & quality: systematic updates and logging, compliant with the AI Act.

Going further

Related resources

AI agents for business →Our full offer Sovereign AI hosted in France →Our confidentiality commitment Knowledge base →Technical documentation & quality

Frequently asked questions

Your questions, our answers

Can AI really find the right version of a drawing or a procedure?

Yes. An AI agent indexes your document management system, your drawings and your quality records, then finds the right up-to-date document from a simple question in plain language — citing its source and its revision. The operator or the design office verifies, but no longer wastes time searching.

Are my drawings and know-how protected?

Yes. Your drawings, process sheets and bills of materials are at the heart of your competitiveness: our agents run locally on site or are hosted in France, with the deployment objective of processing and access operated within the European Union and an architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity.

Do we have to change ERP or document management system?

No. The agent connects to your existing tools (ERP, document management, quality software, CRM) and complements them, without imposing a migration. We adapt the integration to your industrial environment.

Can the agent take calls and handle customer support?

Yes. A voice agent can take incoming calls, qualify the request and route it to the right department; a support agent answers recurring questions (part numbers, manuals, warranties, order status), while handing over to a person as soon as that is needed.

Does AI help with mandatory electronic invoicing?

Yes. Receiving electronic invoices becomes mandatory for all companies on 1 September 2026, and issuing becomes general by 1 September 2027. An AI agent uses the structured data in those invoices to automate checking, reconciliation against orders and processing into the accounts.

Do you have to be a large group to equip yourself?

No. The offer suits an industrial small business just as well as a multi-workshop site.

How long does it take to deploy an agent?

A few weeks as a rule, after a free 15-minute audit that identifies the use case with the best return, then a phase of design, integration and testing before going live and training your teams.

Which tools can people use to talk to the agent?

The ones you already use. Internally, your teams write to it from Microsoft Teams, Slack or by email, just as they would to a colleague: nothing to install, nothing to learn. On the customer side, the agent answers on WhatsApp Business, your website chat and email — your customers reach you where they already write, with no account to create. You keep control from a web dashboard. These connectors rely on open standards, including the MCP protocol; they are included in every plan, at no extra cost, within the number of connections your level includes, and the catalogue grows at no extra cost. Only the fees charged by the platforms themselves — WhatsApp Business bills per conversation — are passed on at actual cost, with no margin, outside the subscription.

Available agents

10 AI agents Blue Lemon Agent deploys for this scope

Production quality supervision agent → Sensor data, alerts. Industrial predictive maintenance agent → IoT sensors, predictive models. Tier-1 technical support assistant (product) → Product knowledge base. Accounting agent (summaries, anomalies) → Accounting connection, alerts. Quality agent (non-conformity tracking) → Quality base, alerts. Stock management agent (alerts, restocking) → Stock integration. Advanced technical support agent (diagnosis + fix) → Technical base, actions. Anomaly and fraud detection → Tax, social security, grants. High risk (AI Act): human control. Testing & software quality (QA) → Test generation, regression detection and quality reports. Technical support & documentation → Tier-1/2 technical helpdesk and documentation kept up to date from the code.

See all 171 catalogue agents and their pricing →

Related industries

Other industries that produce and deliver

Construction & public works →Sites, drawings & documentation Transport & logistics →Flows, deliveries & traceability Small & very small businesses →Everyday productivity

Let's talk

Let us estimate the potential at your site

15 minutes to identify the use case with the best return — hosted in France, supervised, with no commitment.

Free audit (15 min) → Write to us