● Business offer — Communication & advertising

The AI community management agent: plan, publish, moderate and reply

Sizing posts for each network, scheduling the editorial calendar, watching the comments and replying quickly: community management is an all-hours job, rarely given the time it deserves. Your AI agent absorbs that daily flow — content proposals, scheduling, moderation and replies — within your brand guidelines. Hosted in France, on local inference or an isolated resource, your content, your brands and your client data stay with you. The creative direction approves.

Free audit (15 min) → See the prices

Hosted in France Content & brands protected GDPR & AI Act: governed deployment Human oversight

Updated on 07/09/2026

Deployed in a few weeks

Social media assistant · hosted in France

Prepare this week's calendar for the client Maison Verel: LinkedIn, Instagram and a summer collection launch post. Stay within the guidelines.

7 posts proposed across 3 networks, adapted to each format (1080×1350 Instagram, vertical Reels, native LinkedIn).
Summer launch angle: teaser Monday, reveal Wednesday, social proof Friday. Tone, hashtags and calls to action aligned with the Maison Verel guidelines.
Calendar ready for review — nothing is published without your go-ahead.
✎ Action · drafts ready in the schedule — you approve before publication

A negative comment on yesterday's post mentions a delivery delay. What do you reply?

Comment detected (negative tone, subject: after-sales delivery). Proposed reply: acknowledge the inconvenience, invite them to continue by direct message with the order reference, with no commitment on figures.
I have not published it: an after-sales subject deserves your review before sending. I can also escalate to customer service.
⛓ Source · comment thread + the brand's moderation procedure

Local inference · no data outside the EU

Content hosted in France

Sovereign by designLocal inference or hosting in France

GDPR & AI Act: governed deploymentTraceability & human oversight

TurnkeyDesigned, installed and operated for you

The creative direction decidesThe agent assists, never publishes alone

✦ In brief

For a brand, a communication agency or a social media team, a Blue Lemon Agent agent takes on the daily social media work — editorial planning, adapting content per network, scheduling, moderation and replies to comments — always within your brand guidelines. It runs on local inference or is hosted in France: your content, your brands and your advertising clients' data are never exposed to a foreign service, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity. The community manager moves from repetitive execution to editorial steering and relationships. Live within a few weeks Your teams write to it from Microsoft Teams, Slack or their email, and your audiences reach it on WhatsApp Business, your website chat or email — with no account to create and nothing to install. These connections are included in every plan, at no extra cost, within the number of connections your level includes. The accounts followed are the ones you own: Facebook pages, Instagram professional accounts, LinkedIn pages, together with the reviews on your Google Business Profile and on Trustpilot. These are third-party platforms whose interfaces and rules change without notice: the agent prepares and schedules, you decide what goes live, and any access fees those platforms charge are passed on at actual cost, with no margin, outside the subscription. Trustpilot cannot be ordered directly: that connection requires your own Trustpilot for Business account with access to the API module, your Business Unit ID and the matching rights; it is priced on quote, after a feasibility study, with Trustpilot's own costs at your charge.

100%

hosted in France in the target architecture

transfer outside the EU in the target architecture

uses ready to deploy on this scope

decision taken without human approval

Reference points describing our offer, not results measured at a client. The scale of the gain is confirmed by a pilot on your own scope.

The context

Why AI appeals to social media teams — and why they are wary

Social media demands consistency, responsiveness and endless adaptation of content. But entrusting your guidelines, your brands and your clients' data to a consumer tool means losing control of them.

! The issue

The community manager is caught between a publishing pace that never eases (several networks, several brands, several formats) and the expectation of immediate responsiveness on comments and messages. Yet most consumer AI tools amount to entrusting brand guidelines, upcoming content, campaign calendars and advertising clients' data to a third party, often hosted outside Europe and subject to the Cloud Act.

✓ Our answer

AI is only of interest to a brand or an agency if it is sovereign and confidential by design. Local inference or an isolated resource hosted in France, systematic human oversight, publishing and decisions reserved to the team: the time saved on production is never paid for in a leak of your content or your clients'. The aim is not to replace the community manager, but to give them back time for strategy, creativity and relationships.

The decisive point

Your content, your brands, your client data: sovereignty & compliance

A social media team handles the brand's intellectual property and third-party data. Here is how the architecture of our agents protects them, account by account.

Local inference

The agent can run on a machine belonging to the team: no content and no guidelines leave the network, nothing passes through a public cloud.

Hosting in France

Otherwise, a dedicated and isolated resource, hosted in France under French law — your content: processing and access within the European Union targeted by the architecture.

Reduced extraterritorial exposure

For your content and your brands, the architecture aims to reduce exposure to the Cloud Act and FISA 702; being located in France or in the European Union does not, on its own, guarantee immunity: the American hyperscalers have no access to it, even when hosted in Europe.

One isolated resource per brand

No pooling: a strictly dedicated environment, with no mixing between your brands or your advertising clients.

Ownership of the content preserved

Your creations are not used to train a third-party model; encryption, role-based access (RBAC) and logging.

AI Act: governed deployment

An agent strictly in support; no automatic publishing; traceability and human oversight from end to end.

What depends on the architecture chosen These points are not general guarantees: they are settled deployment by deployment, in the quotation.

The applicable location is that of the architecture set out in the quotation and verified before commissioning.
Local execution is announced only for the configuration explicitly described and accepted in the quotation.
The applicable isolation depends on the deployment mode set out in the quotation; no dedicated isolation is presumed.
Roles and permissions are configured and accepted for the identities and systems actually connected.
The events logged, their content, their retention period and who may access them are defined for the deployment chosen.

For the most sensitive accounts and campaigns, SecNumCloud and reinforced hosting options are available depending on your requirements. A single architecture is designed to answer both the GDPR and extraterritorial exposure. Designed for deployment in line with the GDPR and the AI Act, after the processing, roles and context-specific risks have been assessed.

Demonstration

See the agent at work

5 real situations, taken from those that come up most often. Pick one: the exchange unfolds as it would in your organisation.

A scripted demonstration. These exchanges show how the agent behaves — its sources, its refusals, what it leaves to your teams. Nothing is sent from this page, no model is queried here, and the matters named are fictional. That is precisely what we promise your data.
The behaviours shown here — monitoring, automation rules, routing and reminders — are configured with you during deployment, from your tools, your rules and your thresholds.
The architecture points named in these exchanges — location, local execution, isolation, encryption, role-based access, logging — are not a guarantee attached to the demonstration: they are those of the architecture set out in your quotation, and verified before commissioning.

The company in this demonstration

Fictional company

Ancolie Studio — independent social media studio

Sector: Social media for consumer brands
Headcount: 9 staff, including 3 community managers and 1 designer
Client base: 11 client brands — food, fashion, tourism
Volume: 6 networks, around 450 posts and 5,000 comments a month
Tools in place: Scheduler, inboxes for the 6 networks, brand-guide drive, account tracker
Who decides: The editorial lead approves every calendar; the brand approves sensitive statements
Room for improvement: 60 % of the time goes into preparing the calendar; weekend comments wait until Monday morning

Ancolie runs eleven brands with three community managers. The calendar is prepared on Friday for the following week, and nobody reads Saturday's comments before Monday. The agent is connected to the scheduler, the inboxes and the brand-guide drive: it prepares and proposes continuously, the team approves — no post ships without a green light.

This company, its figures and the exchanges that follow were invented for the demonstration. They illustrate a common situation; they describe no real client.

Social media assistant · hosted in France

The calendars for all eleven brands are ready for next week — 42 posts, scheduled, waiting for your green light.
What I built them on: your last twelve months of posting, network by network and brand by brand. Not a general social media rule — the hours that work for Maison Brivet don't work for Kelpie.
· Maison Brivet (food): Tuesday and Thursday 11:30, just before the lunch window. 2.4 times the engagement of other slots.
· Kelpie (fashion): Thursday and Sunday 8 p.m. Sunday evening carries 31 % of their weekly engagement — and it's the slot the team avoided, for want of anyone working evenings.
· Cap Vezelac (tourism): pace doubled in week 12, their booking peak starts a fortnight before the spring holidays.
Three gaps I've left visible: Kelpie has no content for Sunday 22nd, their brief stops on the 19th. I don't fill them with filler: I flag it six days ahead, which leaves time to ask for the material.
What changes: preparing the calendar took 60 % of the team's time. It now takes 18 % — the rest is your review. weekly-calendar_42-posts.pdf11 brands, 6 networks, 3 gaps flagged
⛓ Sourced · scheduler, 12 months of engagement per brand and network

Kelpie's tone changed after their rebrand. Which version are you working from?

From v4, dated 03/09 — and here are the three documents so you can judge.
· Kelpie guideline v4, filed 03/09/2026, after the rebrand. That's the one I apply.
· The rebrand brief saying what changed: informal address kept, but emoji go from three per post to one maximum, and the abbreviation “PAP” is banned.
· v3, still on the drive, applied by mistake to eleven September posts — I've listed them, they're still live.
How I tell them apart when the two files are named almost identically: I compare content and filing date, not names. The drive holds 340 brand documents, 96 of them in duplicate versions.
What I suggest: that I mark the authoritative version at every upload, and flag any post written against an outdated one before it ships. September's eleven would have been caught the same day. brand-memory_340-documents.pdf96 duplicate versions, 11 posts to redo
⛓ Sourced · brand-guide drive, document contents and filing dates

Maison Brivet is launching its winter range. We have the brief, we need everything, fast.

The brief gives one message; I turn it into 6 text adaptations, 18 visuals and 2 variants to test. All on brand, none published.
The texts, one per network and not a copy-paste: the same argument, but length, rhythm and call to action change with the network. On Instagram the hook has to fit the first two visible lines; on LinkedIn it can breathe.
The visuals — 18, from your templates: 6 square, 6 vertical, 6 banners. Grid, margins, typefaces and palette come from the Brivet v2 brand guide; I adapt the crop and the type size, never the guide. Adapting a post across three networks took 37 % of a campaign's time; it now takes 8 %.
The two variants to test: same visual, same time, only the hook changes — one carries the product, the other the use. If one wins, it's the angle that won, not a better-turned sentence.
What I've left highlighted: the brief claims “100 % French origin”. No brand document supports it. That's a claim that binds the advertiser — have it confirmed before publication. winter-launch_6-networks-18-visuals.pdfOne message, six wordings, two variants
⛓ Sourced · advertiser brief, Brivet brand guide v2, studio templates, engagement history

Can this be useful beyond social?

Yes, and it's the seam social most often leaves untouched: what people type into a search engine.
What I see in your own comments: over three months, 212 questions are about how to store Brivet products. It's the number one question, far ahead of price.
What that's worth in search: the closest phrasing gets 1,900 monthly searches, and Brivet has no page for it. You answer it by hand 212 times on social, to a question nobody can find on their site.
What I suggest, in this order: a landing page answering that question, 15 keywords taken from your comments — not from a generator —, and 4 ads pointing to it. Then comment replies link to the page: the same answer works twice.
The loop that creates: comments feed the keywords, the page reduces repetitive comments, and the time saved in moderation goes back into editorial. You approve the page, I prepare the rest. social-to-search_212-questions.pdf15 keywords taken from your comments
⛓ Sourced · 3 months of comments, search volumes, the advertiser's existing pages

We start from scratch on every brief. How do you keep the copywriting from drifting from one brand to the next?

Because copywriting and visual creation both start from a per-brand knowledge base, and every brief is attached to it before a line is written.
The knowledge base, brand by brand: 11 bases, one per client, built from the guidelines drive and twelve months of posts. Each holds the guidelines in force and their date, the banned words, the permitted claims, the mandatory legal notices, and the 46 wordings already approved by the brand — the ones nobody re-approves twice.
Briefs: every client brief enters its brand's knowledge base, dated, and it supersedes the previous instruction without deleting it: Kelpie's redesign brief sits above v3, v3 remains readable, and that is what made it possible to find the eleven September posts written against the old version.
Content writing: for Brivet's winter range, 6 copy variants, one per network, written against the brand's knowledge base rather than a generic tone. Each text shows the guideline line it applies, which makes the editorial lead's approval mechanical: she reads the text with the rule beside it.
Visual creation and its variants: 18 visuals produced from your templates — 6 square, 6 vertical, 6 banners —, and the visual creation declines a single graphic principle rather than inventing three directions. Grid, margins, typefaces and palette come from the guidelines; the embedded text is contrast-checked, because a visual that cannot be read on a phone is a visual lost.
The figure that does not flatter me: out of 212 pieces produced last month, 27 came back for correction, 13 %. 19 of those 27 concerned two brands whose guidelines are over eighteen months old — the knowledge base was right, the guidelines no longer were. What I do with it: I hand you the list of the 4 guideline sets older than twelve months to have re-dated by their brand, and I serve those four flagging the guidelines' age, the way I serve an undated document.
⛓ Source · 11 brand knowledge bases, 46 approved wordings, 27 returns out of 212 pieces

There are 312 comments since Friday evening. It's Monday, 9 a.m.

They were sorted on Saturday morning, 240 have a reply ready, and 14 need a human decision. Nothing has shipped.
· 168 routine questions — availability, ingredients, size, opening hours. Answers taken from the brand's product sheets, with a link to the right page.
· 72 positive messages: a short thank-you in the brand's voice. No sales follow-up — answering a compliment with an offer is the surest way to lose it.
· 44 off-topic or spam: hidden under the rule you set, and the list is returned to you so you can contest it.
· 14 for you, and this is where reputation is decided: 6 order complaints, 4 reasoned grievances, 3 food-safety questions, 1 message describing a difficult personal situation.
Those fourteen I don't touch — and it isn't a technical limit. An automatic reply to a well-founded grievance does more damage than silence, and a food-safety question binds the advertiser. I've drafted one for each; you send it, or rewrite it.
First-pass sorting took 20 % of the team's time. It now takes 6 %, and it happens on Saturday at 8 a.m., not Monday. moderation_312-comments.pdf240 replies ready, 14 for a human
⛓ Sourced · inboxes for the 6 networks, product sheets, the brand's moderation rules

The 6 complaints — where do they end up? The brand's customer service isn't ours.

With their customer service, with the full file — and I'll tell you which ones can't wait.
What I send for each: the full thread, the order number when it's given, the person's public history with the brand — a second complaint in three weeks for one of them — and the holding reply already posted under the comment.
The holding reply does ship without you, because it commits nothing: “we've seen your message, customer service will reply within 24 hours”. It's the only thing I do alone on this channel, and it prevents the second comment, the one saying nobody ever answers.
The two I escalate first: one mentions a product received damaged with a public photo — 340 views in two days —, the other threatens to report the brand. These are no longer complaints, they're reputation matters.
What I suggest: an escalation deadline per type of message, set by you. Today the average gap between a comment and customer service picking it up is 2.6 days; on a complaint with a public photo, every day counts double. service-escalation_what-is-sent.pdf2.6-day average, 2 priority cases
⛓ Sourced · comment threads, record of customer-service handovers, post reach

A topic is rising on Kelpie since last night: 47 mentions against a usual 6. Here's the picture and two replies, ready.
What I observe, without interpreting: 47 mentions in 14 hours, 31 of them reusing the same screenshot — a blog post about the brand's delivery times. Two high-reach accounts have shared it, one with 40,000 followers.
What I know and what I don't: the claim — three-week delivery — matches what 6 comments were already saying last week, and nobody escalated them. I don't know whether the delay is real: only the brand has that information.
Why I'm telling you now: at 47 mentions, a factual reply is still enough. The same topic at 400 mentions can't be handled, only endured. The threshold that triggered the alert is one you set: three times the average over twelve hours.
What I've prepared: two replies, one if the delay is confirmed, one if it isn't. Both say the same thing in substance — what the brand is doing, and when. It's for Kelpie to tell us which is true; I'll publish neither without their word. kelpie-signal_47-mentions.pdfThe picture, two replies, nothing sent
⛓ Sourced · mention tracking across 6 networks, the week's comments, reach of the sharing accounts

And the monthly report for all eleven brands? That's three days of work.

All eleven are ready, each with its reading and two recommendations. You comment on them, you no longer build them.
What each report carries: reach, engagement and follower growth compared with the previous month AND the same month last year — seasonality distorts every reading in food and tourism.
An example of a reading, rather than a mute table: Cap Vezelac loses 12 % engagement over the month. Same month last year: −15 %. That isn't a decline, it's the February trough, and it's shallower than usual. Written exactly like that in the report.
The trends I add: three topics are rising among your brands' audiences and none of the eleven is talking about them. For two of them it's an editorial opportunity; for the third, it's a topic to avoid, and I say why.
What I don't put in the reports: a revenue projection. I have neither the brands' sales nor their basket size — a curve without those two is decoration that turns against you at the first client meeting. monthly-reports_11-brands.pdfCompared with last year, with the reading
⛓ Sourced · statistics from the 6 networks, 24-month history, audience topic tracking

Our account tracker is never up to date. Nobody has time to fill it in.

It's up to date every evening, with nobody entering anything — because I fill it from what actually happened.
What I record daily, per brand: posts shipped and their performance, comments handled, exchanges with the client contact — subject, date, what was asked —, deliverables awaiting approval and for how long.
What surfaces on its own: four brands have had no exchange for more than three weeks. Of the two contracts lost last year, both had that silence in the preceding six weeks. That isn't proof, it's a signal nobody could see because it was written nowhere.
And what it gives you at contract renewal: for Kelpie, 128 posts, 3,400 comments handled and 22 approval round-trips over the quarter. When it's time to renegotiate, those figures carry more weight than conviction.
What I carry instead of a “satisfaction” score: four measures that can each be checked — the contact's average reply time, round-trips before approval, posts postponed at their request, days of silence. For Kelpie, 1.8 round-trips per deliverable against 4.3 on the most strained brand in the portfolio: the gap reads, and it can be discussed. If you still want a single score, I'll compute it for you — from those four measures and with the formula written down, so the calculation can always be redone. A score whose calculation can no longer be read back ends up replacing the fact, and it's the fact that serves you in a renegotiation. account-tracking_no-re-keying.pdf4 brands silent for 3 weeks
⛓ Sourced · scheduler, inboxes, approval log, client exchanges

We'd also like to find new advertisers. We have nobody for that.

Nine brands to approach, drawn from what works for you — and I'll tell you why each one is on the list.
Where the profile comes from: I compared your 5 most profitable brands with the 3 contracts lost. Two traits stand out: a consumer brand already posting but irregularly — it has grasped the point, not found the rhythm — and a single point of contact. When approval goes through three people, your margin halves.
The nine, and the dated fact behind each approach: four opened an account on a new network in the last two months, three posted then stopped, two have just announced a communication hire — those are the warmest.
What I prepare: for each, a verifiable observation about their own posts — rhythm, missing formats, questions left unanswered in comments — and two comparable pieces of your work. You review, you send.
What holds it together: the accounts, messages and brand guides of your eleven clients stay in France, with the deployment objective of processing and access operated within the European Union. And over the quarter, zero posts and zero replies shipped without approval: 1,870 approvals logged, viewable one by one. For a studio that speaks in its clients' names, that's the first thing you'll be asked. new-advertisers_9-brands.pdfA verifiable observation per target
⛓ Sourced · profitability per brand, lost contracts, targets' public posts, approval log

Local inference · no data outside the EU

Your case is not here? That is exactly what a 15-minute conversation is for. Book the free audit →

Use cases

The uses of AI in communication and advertising

Each use corresponds to an agent we deploy. All of them work in support, subject to your approval.

Included in your agent The 7 capabilities essential to this promise are included, at no extra cost.

From 610 € excl. VAT / month

Planning & publishing

Editorial calendar, adaptation for Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn, and post scheduling — ready for review, never published without your go-ahead.

Copywriting & content creation

Captions, hooks, editorial threads and A/B variants in the brand's tone, from your own briefs.

Visual creation & adaptations

Multi-format visuals and multi-channel adaptations to your guidelines, to feed the calendar without a design bottleneck.

Monitoring & campaign reporting

Tracking mentions, trends and performance; reports ready to comment on for your advertising clients.

Knowledge base & briefs

Instantly find a set of guidelines, a brief or a brand guideline in the team's memory.

Moderation & customer relations

Detecting and sorting comments and messages, proposing replies and escalating after-sales matters — subject to approval.

CRM & account follow-up

Keeping the tracking of client accounts, exchanges and actions up to date, with no tedious re-keying.

Controls and safeguards These 3 controls are built into the agent: they frame what it does, whatever plan you pick. They are not chosen and are not added to your order.

Human validation, exceptions and escalation Status, safe closure and audit trail Human validation before publication, with versions retained

What the agent must be connected to This connection is required for the agent to work. It concerns your information system and is scoped during the audit.

Link content to performance, costs and campaign objectives

Need to go further?

These agents handle a different business process, with their own owner and their own price. They are added to this one.

Search & campaigns (SEO/SEA)

Keywords, ads and landing pages to connect social to search and amplify reach.

Search & campaigns (SEO/SEA) from 534 € excl. VAT / month SEO / paid search →

Prospecting & new business

Identifying and qualifying advertiser prospects to feed the agency's business development.

Outbound prospecting agent (automated email, assisted LinkedIn) from 637 € excl. VAT / month Prospecting →

Does your need fall outside this?

In 15 minutes we identify the most relevant agent — without oversizing the project.

Book the free audit → Build your agent

The gain

How much time can a social media team win back?

By automating content adaptation, scheduling and the first pass of moderation, a team can aim for an appreciable reduction in editorial production time — reinvested in strategy and relationships.

Preparing a weekly editorial calendar

Today · done by hand

Prepared by the agent, to approve

Adapting a post across 3 networks

Today · done by hand

Near-instant

First pass on the comments to moderate

Today · done by hand

Automatic

Qualitative, non-contractual comparison: the proportions shown illustrate the shift of the work towards review, they represent no measurement. Every output of the agent is reviewed and approved by a competent person.

How it works

The stages of your AI agent project

Audit & scoping

15 minutes to target the use case with the best return.

Quote or direct sign-up

A catalogue offer is bought online; a specific need gets a costed quote.

Design

We design the agent and its guardrails.

Integration & testing

We connect your tools to the agent, which is itself hosted in France.

Rollout

Going live and training your team.

Operation

Continuous supervision and improvement.

Pricing

Three options, one agent

A community management agent (planning, publishing, moderation, replies), installed and operated for you. Choose according to how you work. Prices exclude VAT — annual subscription, the time it takes for the gains to settle in.

Agility

Setup + controlled subscription

9,080 € ^{excl. VAT} setup

then 610 € ^{excl. VAT}/month — you invest at installation and pay a reduced subscription. Ideal for keeping the cost under control over time.

Installation, configuration and training for your teams
Operation, human oversight, updates and support
Sovereign hosting in France, a dedicated and isolated resource

Order →

The simplest Serenity

All inclusive, no setup fee

1,115 € ^{excl. VAT} /month

all inclusive, immediate start. No upfront investment: a single subscription. Ideal for starting quickly and simply.

Setup included (installation, configuration, training)
Operation, human oversight, updates and support
Sovereign hosting in France, managed end to end

Order →

100% Sovereign

On site, you own it

12,865 € ^{excl. VAT} setup

then 811 € ^{excl. VAT}/month · + hardware from 2,491 € (one-off purchase, in addition) — a sovereign computer installed on your premises, maintained remotely. Models run locally, your data returned at the end of the contract. 36-month commitment.

Hardware installed on your premises (you own it)
French / European AI models run locally
Secure remote maintenance (Pro support included)

Order →

Not included in the packages: AI consumption (model tokens), re-invoiced at real cost with no margin, and tracked in real time in your client area. Maintenance and supervision subscription for an initial term of 12 months for the Agility package, 24 months for the Serenity package and 36 months for the 100% Sovereign package, renewable; support levels (SLA 72 h / 24 h / 4 h) optional. Bespoke development, additional integrations or exceptional volumes are quoted separately. Support Monday to Friday, 9am to 6pm. Prices exclude VAT.

AI model: none of the AI models offered currently carries a fixed surcharge. When the selected model carries a cost, that cost is shown when you choose it, before you order, and re-invoiced at the cost incurred, with no mark-up; usage is billed at the publisher's price. Publishers' prices are published in US dollars: the amount re-invoiced is the amount in euros actually borne by Blue Lemon Agent on the publisher's invoice, at that invoice's exchange rate, with no commission or mark-up.

Included components and additional components Components included in the base offer: the Blue Lemon Agent software foundation, the AI models listed in the order journey, the standard channels (Microsoft Teams, Slack, WhatsApp Business, email, website chat, calendars, Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace, file storage, market VoIP telephony, professional social-media pages and accounts, Google Business Profile), hosting in France for the package chosen, backups, supervision, updates and support. If adapting the AI agent to your constraints, your needs or your requests requires other paid components — a third-party publisher's software licence, paid API access to one of your applications, hosting of health data, for which French law requires an HDS-certified host (art. L. 1111-8 of the French Public Health Code), SecNumCloud-qualified hosting, a speech synthesis service, particular hardware —, they are offered to you as an option or on quotation and re-invoiced at the cost incurred; nothing is committed without your written agreement. Where the artificial intelligence model you choose entails an additional cost, that cost is shown to you before you order and re-invoiced to you at the cost incurred, with no margin.

What to expect

Go-live 2 to 3 weeks

Agent designed, channels connected, team trained.

Steady state 4 to 7 weeks

After a few weeks of real use, once the agent's behaviour matches what you expect. Indicative estimate, adjusted to the options you keep. It is not a delivery commitment.

See the full price list →

Estimate my gains in 1 minute →

Our commitment

Four guarantees that matter to a brand or an agency

Your content and your brands never leaveLocal inference or an isolated resource hosted in France; no guidelines or creations entrusted to a foreign third party.

Data in France, under French lawYour content and your brands: minimisation and location in France, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity.

The creative direction keeps the decisionThe agent produces verifiable drafts, calendars and replies; no publishing is automated.

Human oversight & traceabilityFull traceability for planning & publishing: monitoring, updates and logging compliant with the AI Act.

Going further

Related resources

AI agents for business →Our full offer Sovereign AI hosted in France →Our confidentiality commitment Copywriting & content creation →The fuel for your calendar

Frequently asked questions

Your questions, our answers

Does the agent publish to our social networks on its own?

No. The agent prepares the calendar, adapts the content per network and proposes replies, but nothing goes live without your team's approval. Human oversight is the rule: the agent assists, and it is the creative direction that decides and publishes.

Who owns the content the agent produces?

Your content, your visuals and your brand guidelines remain your property. Our agents run locally or on an isolated resource hosted in France: your creations are not used to train a third-party model and are never reused outside your own environment.

Is our advertising clients' data protected?

Yes. In an agency you handle your clients' brands and data: our agents run locally or are hosted in France, with the deployment objective of processing and access operated within the European Union and an architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity. Each brand has an isolated environment, with no mixing between accounts.

Does the agent really respect our guidelines and brand tone?

Yes. We calibrate the agent on your editorial guidelines, your brand guidelines and your examples: tone, vocabulary, hashtags and formats. The proposals are designed to read like what your team would write, and are still reviewed before publication.

How does the agent handle moderation and negative comments?

The agent detects and sorts comments and messages, spots sensitive subjects (after-sales, complaints, a brewing backlash) and proposes a reply that fits your procedure. On delicate subjects it does not publish alone: it alerts you and can escalate to the department concerned.

Does the agent connect to our publishing tools?

Yes. The agent integrates with your existing tools (scheduling, Facebook pages, Instagram professional accounts, LinkedIn pages, creative suite, CRM) and complements them, without imposing a migration. We adapt the integration to your environment.

How long does it take to deploy a community management agent?

A few weeks as a rule, after a free 15-minute audit that identifies the use case with the best return, then a phase of design, integration and testing before going live and training your team.

Which tools can people use to talk to the agent?

The ones you already use. Internally, your teams write to it from Microsoft Teams, Slack or by email, just as they would to a colleague: nothing to install, nothing to learn. On the audience side, the agent answers on WhatsApp Business, your website chat and email — people reach you where they already write, with no account to create. A question asked in a comment often turns into an after-sales request: the agent picks it up on the customer's own channel and escalates it when it commits you. You keep control from a web dashboard. These connectors rely on open standards, including the MCP protocol; they are included in every plan, at no extra cost, within the number of connections your level includes, and the catalogue grows at no extra cost. Only the fees charged by the platforms themselves — WhatsApp Business bills per conversation — are passed on at actual cost, with no margin, outside the subscription.

Does the agent follow our Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn accounts, and online reviews?

Yes, whenever it makes sense for you. The agent works on the accounts you own — your Facebook pages, your Instagram professional accounts, your LinkedIn pages — and on the reviews left on your Google Business Profile and on Trustpilot. It flags what has just been posted, ranks it by urgency and drafts a reply in your brand's voice. Comments and private messages join the same queue as the editorial calendar: a public remark does not sit unanswered until Monday morning. Two things need saying plainly. These are third-party platforms: they belong to others, their interfaces and their rules change without notice, and the connection follows those changes. And publishing in your name stays under your control: the agent prepares and proposes, and you decide what goes live. Some of these platforms charge for their own access: those fees are passed on to you at actual cost, with no margin, outside the subscription. The exact set of connected platforms is settled during the design phase.

Related use cases

Other agents for communication and advertising

Copywriting & content creation →Captions, hooks and editorial threads Visual creation & adaptations →Multi-format visuals to your guidelines Search & campaigns (SEO/SEA) →Connecting social to search

Let's talk

Let us estimate the potential across your social networks

15 minutes to identify the use case with the best return — hosted in France, supervised, with no commitment.

Free audit (15 min) → Write to us