We build Agents. You build the Future.
● B2B offer — The full sales cycleThe sales cycle: run up to the decisive meeting
A sales cycle chains together prospecting, qualification, follow-ups, sending materials and preparing the decisive meeting. Your agent runs that chain across your channels, keeps the CRM up to date and prepares the salesperson's file for the moment that counts. Data hosted in France; the AI model is called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option. With the 100% Sovereign package, your prospect data and your terms stay with you. Its sends go out under a sending mandate that you write and withdraw with a word. Price, scope and signature belong to the salesperson.
Updated on
Fictional simulation — not a client result
The materials prospects asked for have been sent and recorded in the CRM, with the channel noted.
Four deals are ready for a meeting: the preparation file is put together.
🔗 Sourced · the CRM and the history of exchanges
Granting a discount commits your margin: that is a commercial decision, and the file is ready so you can take it quickly.
✎ Support · file gathered, commercial decision
For an organisation established outside the European Union, the law of its own country applies; at its request, we put equivalent safeguards in place (human review before any action, a log of the criteria, information for the people concerned).
A Blue Lemon Agent sales agent runs the sales cycle across your channels — prospecting, qualification, follow-ups, sending materials — keeps your CRM up to date and puts together the preparation file for the decisive meeting. Price, scope and signature stay with the salesperson. Data hosted in France; the AI model is called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option. With the 100% Sovereign package, your prospect data stays with you, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity.
These figures describe our offer, not results measured at a client. How large the gain is on your deal volume and number of channels is confirmed by a pilot.
Indicative estimate, to be confirmed by a pilot on your real files (general terms of sale, article 4).
One package, one agent
An end-to-end sales agent (the cycle, the CRM, meeting files), installed and operated for you.
Setup + controlled subscription
- Installation, configuration and training for your teams
- Operation, human oversight, updates and support
- Hosting in France, a dedicated and isolated resource
All inclusive, no setup fee
- Setup included (installation, configuration, training)
- Operation, human oversight, updates and support
- Hosting in France, managed end to end
On site, you own it
- Hardware installed on your premises (you own it)
- French / European AI models run locally
- Secure remote maintenance (Pro support included)
What does the agent actually do?
One agent, the whole way to the meeting. All these uses work in support: subject to your approval, or under a written sending mandate for what the agent sends by itself.
Running the cycle
Chains together prospecting, qualification, follow-ups and sending materials across your channels, under a written sending mandate; outside a mandate, every send waits for your approval.
A CRM kept up to date
Records every exchange with its channel and places the deal within the cycle.
The meeting file
Puts together the history, the materials sent, the objections and the terms that apply.
Qualification & follow-up
For multi-channel qualification alone, a lighter dedicated agent is enough.
Need to go further?
These agents handle a different business process, with their own owner and their own price. They are added to this one.
Sales steering
To track results by dimension, a dedicated steering agent completes the picture.
Sales steering agent (KPIs, alerts) from 244 € excl. VAT / month Sales steering →AI sales & CRM agent
Every salesperson knows it: the CRM is never really up to date.
Sales agent (meeting notes, follow-ups, CRM) from 307 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →AI agent for lead qualification and appointment booking
A lead who contacts you expects an answer straight away.
Lead qualification / appointment booking agent from 312 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →Sales proposals
A proposal that repeats the previous one word for word shows immediately.
Sales proposal agent from 254 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →In 30 minutes we identify the most relevant agent — without oversizing the project.
See the agent at work
4 everyday situations, taken from those that come up most often. Pick one: the exchange unfolds as it would in your organisation.
A scripted demonstration. These exchanges show how the agent behaves — its sources, its refusals, what it leaves to your teams. Nothing is sent from this page, no model is queried here, and the matters named are fictional. That is precisely what we promise your data. The behaviours shown here — monitoring, automation rules, routing and reminders — are configured with you during deployment, from your tools, your rules and your thresholds. The architecture points named in these exchanges — location, local execution, isolation, encryption, role-based access, logging — are not a guarantee attached to the demonstration: they are those of the architecture set out in your quotation, and verified before commissioning.
The company in this demonstration
Fictional companyAteliers Vernoy — maker of bespoke technical furniture for laboratories and workshops, fictional company
- Sector
- Bespoke technical furniture manufacturing — fitting out laboratories and industrial workshops. Sales at list price, lead times calculated on the workshops' actual load.
- Headcount
- 84 employees, including a sales team of 4: a sales director, two account executives and an account manager.
- Who is served
- Laboratories, technical centres and industrial workshops. Accounts above €50,000 of annual billing get one extra follow-up — the fourth one produced 3 deals this quarter — and go through review.
- Order of magnitude
- 88 messages sent overnight under a sending mandate; 41 proposals prepared this quarter, 34 of them ready for validation on the day of the verbal agreement; three follow-ups, at 5, 12 and 25 days.
- Tools in place
- The prospect file and its source field, now mandatory on import, the price list, the workshops' load plan, the public registers that date the facts quoted, and the objections register — the agent works inside what is opened to it, nothing is replaced.
- Who decides
- The sales director writes the sending mandate, sets its scope, ceiling and duration, and withdraws it in one word: the agent sends on its own only what it covers, and every send is logged. Price, offer scope, discounts and signature belong to the salesperson: the agent prepares the file and the proposal for validation, and the salesperson sets the price, grants the discount and signs. 7 proposals this quarter called for a decision from management, settled in three hours on average. The data owner sets how long prospects are kept. One single limit no mandate can lift: a person's objection to being canvassed, which article 21 of the GDPR makes absolute.
- Improvement points
- Eleven days used to pass on average between a verbal agreement and a proposal going out: for 34 of the quarter's 41 proposals, the file is now ready for validation the same day. 340 imported addresses are waiting for their source to be written down — 297 already are and can go out the same day, 43 remain to be settled in one meeting. 12 messages in 100 still go through review, about an hour a month, while 3 safeguards reproduce 29 of the 31 stops recorded over six months. And 2 texts out of 11 concentrated 60% of the opt-outs: taken out of rotation, the rate came back from 11% to 4% at equal volume.
Ateliers Vernoy build to order, sell at list price and calculate lead times on the workshops' actual load. The sales cycle rests on four people, and eleven days used to pass on average between a verbal agreement and the proposal going out. The agent identifies companies, writes the message backed by a dated fact, sends it within the sending mandate the sales director has written (outside the mandate, the message waits for his validation), follows up on schedule, then prepares the file and the proposal for validation: scope taken from the exchange, lead time calculated on the actual load, terms. The salesperson sets the price, grants any discount and signs; every price objection comes back to him with the account history. The exchanges that follow cover one night of work and the quarter it extends, from the first list to the proposal handed to the salesperson, then what the company keeps in hand: the source of every address, the objections register, and who validated what.
This company, its figures and the exchanges that follow were invented for the demonstration. They illustrate a common situation; they describe no real client.
Fictional simulation — not a client result
· I prepared and sent 88 messages within your sending mandate, each backed by a dated fact.
· I prepared 6 proposals: the file and the proposal are ready, the price, any discount and the signature are yours. They are waiting for you.
· Two texts out of eleven accounted for 60 % of opt-outs. I pulled them from rotation. The rate fell from 11 % to 4 %, at the same volume.
· 340 addresses are waiting for your go-ahead: their origin was still to be documented, and I have already reconstructed it for 297 of them — one sentence from you and they go back out the same day. overnight_88-sends_6-proposals.pdfWhat went out under mandate · what is waiting for you
⛓ Source · 88 sends under mandate, 6 proposals to validate, opt-outs from 11 % to 4 %
What I prepare for him: the file for each proposal — scope taken from the exchange with the customer, lead time computed on your workshops' real load, terms from your template, account history, comparable deals —, ready to validate, the price left to his decision.
What it produced this quarter: 34 proposals ready to validate on the day of the verbal agreement, against an eleven-day average before. Karim Belhadj, your sales director, got those eleven days back for the deals that deserved them.
What comes back to management: this quarter, 7 proposals — five on a price decision, two on a lead time a workshop could not meet. You decided in three hours on average.
What you set whenever you like: the sending mandate — scope, ceiling, duration —, which covers messages only and is withdrawn in one word. Price, discount and signature are never part of it: they stay with the salesperson. your-sending-mandate.pdfWhat the agent sends alone · what stays with the salesperson · what you set whenever you like
⛓ Source · price, discount and signature with the salesperson, 34 proposals ready same day, 7 settled
What it does alone: identifies companies matching your criteria, writes and sends the message backed by a dated fact within your sending mandate, follows up on your calendar, builds the file and the proposal for validation — scope taken from the exchange, lead time computed on your real capacity, terms from your template — then keeps the calendar until the answer.
What it brings back: anything outside the mandate or calling for a decision, to whoever can decide — the price, a discount or the signature to the salesperson, a proposal with an unworkable lead time to the sales director, a prospect already in dispute to the account manager, a list of unknown origin to whoever answers for data.
With a monthly summary: sends, replies, proposals prepared, escalations and how fast they were handled, opt-outs by message, and deals signed by customers against proposals sent by your salespeople.
The one thing the law forbids it, and it applies this without exception: contacting again a person who has objected. Article 21 of the GDPR makes that right absolute in direct marketing — no mandate can lift it, and it is the only bound of its kind in the whole of its operation.
✎ Framework · price, discount and signature with the salesperson · one legal bound, GDPR art. 21
Fictional simulation — not a client result
Your current setting: direct send for messages backed by a fact verified in a public register; read-through for existing customers, companies in dispute, and accounts above €50,000 of annual billing. Twelve messages in a hundred go through the read-through.
What the read-through caught in six months: 31 messages, including 7 to a company in dispute with you — they would have landed at the worst moment — and 4 based on an announced hire that was a replacement.
What it costs: fifteen seconds per message, about an hour a month at the current setting.
If you want to delegate every message: I switch to direct send throughout, and I keep the three guard rails that produced 29 of the 31 stops — existing customer, live dispute, fact older than 90 days. You keep 95 % of the read-through's benefit without keeping its time. Léa Vasseur, your account manager, moved her portfolio onto it two months ago: no incident.
The slider only governs messages: price, discount and signature stay with the salesperson, whichever position it is in. delegation-slider_31-stops.pdf3 guard rails reproduce 29 of the 31 stops
⛓ Source · 31 stops in six months, 29 reproducible by automatic rule
What crossed, and it is the only thing to settle: two of your rules pointed to opposite doors for the same message — direct send for a message backed by a fact verified in a public register, read-through for an account above €50,000 of annual billing. This recipient met both, and I applied the first when it is the second that protects you.
What the message contained, because that is what you will ask first: the dated fact was accurate and sourced, the company was out of dispute and outside your customer portfolio. What it lacked was your eye, not its accuracy — and your eye is exactly what the €50,000 rule reserves for those accounts.
What I did within the hour: I went back over the quarter's sends on the same crossing — 3 other accounts, 3 messages, all backed by a verified fact and all out of dispute — and I put the question to you rather than settling it a second time in your place: a rule that contradicts itself belongs to whoever wrote it.
What Karim Belhadj settled this morning, and it is in the settings, dated: when two of your rules cross, the more restrictive one wins — the read-through comes before direct send. And I name you the two rules that crossed, every time it happens, so the arbitration stays yours.
What it costs the setting: fifteen more seconds of read-through on those accounts, and the slider you have just seen does not move a notch. two-rules-crossing_88th-message.pdf87 of 88 through the intended door, the ruling made and dated
⛓ Source · 88 sends overnight, two of the client's rules crossed, settled by the sales director
What needs deciding: those 340 addresses arrived in an imported file with no mention of where they came from. They may be perfectly regular. Somebody needs to be able to say so, because a recipient is entitled to ask where you got their address.
What I prepared to make it quick: the 340 split by likely source — 210 match a trade show you exhibited at, 87 a form on your site, 43 match nothing. For the first 297, the origin is documented in one sentence and they go back out the same day.
What I propose for the remaining 43: either you set them aside, or I treat them as a cold first contact with the matching origin statement — which is lawful in business-to-business prospecting, provided opting out is possible from the first message, which it is.
What I now do at the door: every imported file asks for its origin and date, and the field takes five seconds to fill. The problem will not recur. 340-addresses_297-documentable.pdfSettled in one meeting · origin field now required at import
⛓ Source · 297 of 340 documentable at once, 43 to arbitrate
Fictional simulation — not a client result
What it prepares today: for each proposal, the file ready to validate — scope, lead time computed on the real load, terms, account history. Of 41 proposals, 34 ready to validate on the day of the verbal agreement, 5 corrected on lead time after a workshop constraint came back, 2 dropped.
What it puts in front of the salesperson for a discount: the elements that can justify it — volume, term commitment, payment on delivery — and the three most comparable recent deals. The salesperson decides whether to grant a discount and at what rate; the agent does not improvise a commercial gesture.
What it does when a customer objects on price: it escalates the objection to the salesperson, with the account history and the file ready, for him to answer.
What it gives you back: eleven days of average delay recovered between verbal agreement and the proposal being ready. On a sales cycle, eleven days is how long a competitor needs to position itself. 41-proposals_34-ready.pdfWhat the agent prepares · what the salesperson decides · the price objection escalated
⛓ Source · 41 proposals, 34 ready same day, 11 days recovered
Your setting: three follow-ups, at 5, 12 and 25 days. You can make it five, or two, or space them differently by segment. On accounts above €50,000 you set four, and the fourth contact produced 3 deals this quarter.
The bound nobody can lift: a person's objection to being approached. Article 21 of the GDPR makes it absolute — once expressed, processing for direct marketing stops. No mandate you could give me can work around it, and I apply it across every channel and the whole catalogue at once.
What it protects you from: it is precisely that bound which prevented a repeat of the prospect approached on three channels in eight days by two salespeople working from separate lists. Since the refusal is shared across all salespeople, it has not happened again.
What I distinguish: a "no" on an offer leaves the account open for another; a "do not contact me again" closes everything. Both are recorded with their date and their reach. adjustable-calendar_legal-bound.pdfWhat you set · the one bound nobody lifts
⛓ Source · adjustable calendar, GDPR art. 21 absolute, refusal shared across salespeople
Fictional simulation — not a client result
What the record shows: the address's origin and its date, the message sent as it went out, who validated it or the sending mandate it went out under, the dated fact that justified the contact with its source, and the exchanges since.
What it changes in the conversation: a surprised recipient who gets "you filled in our form on 12 March, here is the line" does not ask twice. Of the 14 requests received this half-year, 12 stopped at that answer and 2 led to an objection, recorded the same day.
What you keep beyond the record: the objections. They outlive the deletion of a prospect — otherwise deleting a record would reopen the door the following month and the person would receive again the message they had refused. It is the only data I keep without a time limit, and it allows one thing only: knowing this address must not be written to.
What you set: the retention period for prospects without contact. Three years is the usual benchmark; your data officer decides that, not me. what-you-have-on-screen.pdf12 of 14 requests closed in one answer
⛓ Source · 14 requests, 12 closed on the first answer, objections kept without limit
What I produce by default: by message (which produces opt-outs, which gets replies), by segment, by list source, by offer, and proposals prepared against escalations. Those four explain almost all the variance.
If you want the individual level: it is lawful, and I set it up. The French DPA restates that an employer has the power to frame and monitor staff activity. I supply the prior information notice (art. L1222-4), the works council consultation file and a proportionate scope — half a day of work you will not have to do.
What I tell you first, so you choose: a salesperson measured on send volume reads through faster, and the read-through is what caught the 7 messages to the company in dispute. Measured on deals signed, the effect does not occur. It is a question of which indicator you pick, not of prohibition.
What I keep in every case: who validated and signed what — the message, the proposal, the salesperson's signature. A signature is not a counter — it is what lets you answer a recipient, and it is also what you will ask for if a deal goes wrong. what-you-get-back.pdf6 items to hand · the individual level equipped if you want it
⛓ Source · French DPA, art. L1222-4 · works council file supplied · indicator effect documented
Your case is not here? That is exactly what a 30-minute conversation is for. Discuss your project →
The stages of your AI agent project
Audit & scoping
30 minutes to target the use case with the best return.
Quote or direct sign-up
A catalogue offer is bought online; a specific need gets a costed quote.
Design
We design the agent and its guardrails.
Integration & testing
We connect your tools to the agent, which is itself hosted in France.
Rollout
Going live and training your team.
Operation
Continuous supervision and improvement.
What does an AI agent bring to your sales cycle?
A salesperson is most useful in a meeting. Everything that leads there can be prepared methodically.
! The issue
A sales cycle has many preparation steps and a small number of decisive moments. The former are methodical: follow-ups, sending materials, updating the CRM, building the file. The agent runs them and brings each deal up to the meeting, with the full context of the exchange.
✓ Our answer
Your salespeople arrive at the meeting with a file already built: history, materials sent, objections raised, standard terms that apply. Price, scope and signature commit the company and remain their decisions, as does any discount outside the rate card. Data hosted in France on an isolated resource; the AI model is called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option. With that option, your prospect data and your commercial terms are entrusted to no third party.
Your prospect data and your commercial terms: sovereignty & compliance
Your prospect data falls under the GDPR and your commercial terms are strategic. Here is how they are protected.
Local inference
With the 100% Sovereign package, the agent runs on a machine belonging to your organisation: no prospect data and no commercial terms leave the network.
Hosting in France
Otherwise, with the Agility and Serenity packages, a dedicated, isolated resource hosted in France, under French law: data hosted in France; the AI model is called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option.
Reduced extraterritorial exposure
For your prospect data and your commercial terms, the architecture aims to reduce exposure to the Cloud Act and FISA 702; being located in France or in the European Union does not, on its own, guarantee immunity.
Isolated resource
No pooling: an environment strictly dedicated to your company and its sales cycle.
No commitment made in the company's name
Price, scope, discounts and signature stay outside the agent's remit; encryption, role-based access and logging of every exchange.
AI Act: governed deployment
The agent carries out what you have authorised; it sends by itself only under a written sending mandate (scope, ceiling, duration), logged and withdrawn with a word; no price quoted, no discount granted and no contract signed; traceability and human oversight from end to end.
What depends on the architecture chosen These points are not general guarantees: they are settled deployment by deployment, in the quotation.
- The applicable location is that of the architecture set out in the quotation and verified before commissioning.
- Local execution is announced only for the configuration explicitly described and accepted in the quotation.
- The applicable isolation depends on the deployment mode set out in the quotation; no dedicated isolation is presumed.
- Roles and permissions are configured and accepted for the identities and systems actually connected.
- The events logged, their content, their retention period and who may access them are defined for the deployment chosen.
How many meetings can a salesperson take on?
By taking on the preparation of the cycle, the effort shifts towards meetings and negotiation. How large the gain is depends on your volume and remains to be confirmed by a pilot.
Four guarantees that matter to your business development
Related resources
Your questions, our answers
Does the agent close sales?
Does it quote prices to prospects?
Does the agent send its messages by itself?
How is the GDPR respected in prospecting?
How does this differ from multi-channel qualification?
Are our commercial terms protected?
How long does it take to deploy this agent?
Who may be prospected, and through which channel?
Can the agent notify my contacts by text message?
Other agents for sales
Let's size up the potential in your sales cycle
30 minutes to frame your channels and your CRM — hosted in France, supervised, with no commitment.