We build Agents. You build the Future.
● B2B offer — Farmers & farm businessesThe AI agent for farmers: less paperwork, more time on the farm
CAP and MSA deadlines, the plant-protection register, cross-compliance, grant applications: administration takes up precious time, far from the crops and the herd. Your AI agent keeps your calendar and your checklists, prepares your register and your applications, and flags what is missing before an inspection. It never rules on compliance and files nothing on your behalf: the decision stays with the farmer and their adviser. Hosted in France — on local inference or an isolated resource — your farm data stays confidential. You keep control and the decision.
Updated on
Deployed in a few weeks
Farm assistant · hosted in France
Fictional simulation — not a client result
The inspection is coming: go through my cross-compliance file. What is missing?
File checked point by point against the list of expected items, in its dated version. 11 documents present, 2 missing — the sprayer inspection certificate, due in 34 days, and this season's fertilisation plan. 1 point to check: the share of the main crop across your utilised agricultural area since the switch from barley to sunflower.
I rule on nothing: the list is ready for your adviser, for your approval.
⛓ Sourced · your documents, your parcel register, the list of expected items and its date
I rule on nothing: the list is ready for your adviser, for your approval.
⛓ Sourced · your documents, your parcel register, the list of expected items and its date
The parcel in sunflower — does that change anything?
Point to watch: this change of cover weighs on your rotation and on the share of the main crop. Recommendation: check that share before you settle the cropping plan.
I am preparing a sourced summary note to put to your adviser at the chamber of agriculture, for your approval — the assessment is theirs and yours.
✎ Action · note ready to read over — you decide
I am preparing a sourced summary note to put to your adviser at the chamber of agriculture, for your approval — the assessment is theirs and yours.
✎ Action · note ready to read over — you decide
Data hosted in France · sovereign model as an option
Data hosted in France
Hosted in FranceAI model called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option
Farm data protected
GDPR & AI Act: governed deploymentTraceability & human oversight
TurnkeyDesigned, installed and operated for you
The farmer decidesThe agent carries out what you have authorised
For an organisation established outside the European Union, the law of its own country applies; at its request, we put equivalent safeguards in place (human review before any action, a log of the criteria, information for the people concerned).
✦ In brief
On a farm, a Blue Lemon Agent agent takes on the repetitive administration — CAP, MSA and grant deadlines and checklists, a cross-compliance consistency check of the file, PCAE and MAEC grant applications, the plant-protection register — and flags what is missing before an inspection. Data hosted in France; the AI model is called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option. With that option, your parcel, financial and livestock data is never exposed to a foreign service, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity. The agent prepares and alerts; you approve, you file and you remain responsible for your declarations. Pre-filling the CAP and MSA declarations is not included: it is offered on quotation. Live within a few weeks.
100%
hosted in France in the target architecture
0
transfer outside the EU with the Sovereign model option (target architecture)
4
uses ready to deploy on this scope
0
decision with a legal or significant effect taken by an agent
Reference points describing our offer, not results measured at a client. The scale of the gain is confirmed by a pilot on your own scope.
Indicative estimate, to be confirmed by a pilot on your real files (general terms of sale, article 4).
Pricing
One package, one agent
An agent that keeps your deadlines, checks your cross-compliance file, prepares your grant applications and your plant-protection register, installed and operated for you.
Agility
Setup + controlled subscription
4,690 € excl. VAT setup
then 389 € excl. VAT/month — you invest at installation and pay a reduced subscription. Ideal for keeping the cost under control over time.
- Installation, configuration and training for your teams
- Operation, human oversight, updates and support
- Hosting in France, a dedicated and isolated resource
The simplest
Serenity
All inclusive, no setup fee
649 € excl. VAT /month
all inclusive, immediate start. No upfront investment: a single subscription. Ideal for starting quickly and simply.
- Setup included (installation, configuration, training)
- Operation, human oversight, updates and support
- Hosting in France, managed end to end
100% Sovereign
On site, you own it
6,725 € excl. VAT setup
then 490 € excl. VAT/month · + hardware from 2,491 € (one-off purchase, in addition) — a sovereign computer installed on your premises, maintained remotely. Models run locally, your data returned at the end of the contract.
- Hardware installed on your premises (you own it)
- French / European AI models run locally
- Secure remote maintenance (Pro support included)
Included in the package: hosting and AI consumption up to the volume of your capacity tier, in documents, exchanges, tokens and storage; beyond that, re-invoiced at real cost with no margin, tracked in your client area as usage statements are issued. Maintenance and supervision subscription for an initial term of 12 months for the Agility package, 24 months for the Serenity package and 36 months for the 100% Sovereign package, renewable; support levels (SLA 72 h / 24 h / 4 h) optional. Bespoke development, additional integrations or exceptional volumes are quoted separately. Support Monday to Friday, 9am to 6pm. Prices exclude VAT.
AI model:
none of the AI models offered currently carries a fixed surcharge. When the selected model carries a cost, that cost is shown when you choose it, before you order, and re-invoiced at the cost incurred, with no mark-up; usage is billed at the publisher's price. Publishers' prices are published in US dollars: the amount re-invoiced is the amount in euros actually borne by Blue Lemon Agent on the publisher's invoice, at that invoice's exchange rate, with no commission or mark-up.
Included components and additional components Components included in the base offer: the Blue Lemon Agent software foundation, the AI models listed in the order journey, the standard channels (Microsoft Teams, Slack, WhatsApp Business, email, website chat, calendars, Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace, file storage, market VoIP telephony, professional social-media pages and accounts, Google Business Profile), hosting for the package chosen, in France by default, backups, supervision, updates and support. If adapting the AI agent to your constraints, your needs or your requests requires other paid components — a third-party publisher's software licence, paid API access to one of your applications, hosting of health data, for which French law requires an HDS-certified host (art. L. 1111-8 of the French Public Health Code), SecNumCloud-qualified hosting, a speech synthesis service, particular hardware —, they are offered to you as an option or on quotation and re-invoiced at the cost incurred; nothing is committed without your written agreement. Where the artificial intelligence model you choose entails an additional cost, that cost is shown to you before you order and re-invoiced to you at the cost incurred, with no margin.
What to expect
Go-live
2 to 3 weeks
Agent designed, channels connected, team trained.
Steady state
4 to 7 weeks
After a few weeks of real use, once the agent's behaviour matches what you expect.
Indicative estimate, adjusted to the options you keep. It is not a delivery commitment.
Use cases
The uses of AI on a farm
Four uses included in your agent, and what can be added on quotation. The agent carries out by itself what you authorise it to do; you decide what it does on its own and what it submits to you. It never rules on compliance and files nothing on your behalf: the decision stays with the farmer and their adviser.
Included in your agent
The 4 capabilities essential to this promise are included, at no extra cost.
From 389 € excl. VAT / month
Deadlines & checklists (CAP, MSA, grants)
A calendar of your filing deadlines and checklists of the documents expected, with reminders and a monthly summary; you file yourself on the official portals.
Cross-compliance consistency check of the prepared file
Your documents checked point by point against the list of expected cross-compliance items, from your data or an export from your software; never a compliance ruling.
Preparing grant applications (PCAE, MAEC)
Documents, forms and letters gathered and checked before filing, blocking points flagged; filing remains yours and eligibility rests with the case officer.
Plant-protection register: assisted entry & machine-readable export
An entry form opened at each purchase, matched against your invoices and your parcel register, a time-stamped machine-readable export; the fields only you know stay in your hands.
Controls and safeguards
These 2 controls are built into the agent: they frame what it does, whatever plan you pick. They are not chosen and are not added to your order.
Human oversight, costs, quality, incidents and safe stop
Keep records, evidence, CAP/MSA deadlines and regulatory versions
What the agent must be connected to
These 2 connections are required for the agent to work. They concern your information system and are scoped during the audit.
Handoff contracts, least-privilege permissions and shared context
Work simply on mobile and with imperfect connectivity
Optional, on quotation
These capabilities are not included in the price above. They are scoped with you and quoted separately; none of them can be ordered from this page.
Preparing the CAP online declaration
Pre-filling the area claim from your parcel register and your cropping plan, for your approval — you file it yourself. Outside the base: offered on quotation, after scoping.
Not yet in the catalogue — not orderable Talk to us about it →MSA, VAT & farm accounts: pre-filling
MSA and VAT returns prepared for your farm accounting centre, which checks and approves. Outside the base: offered on quotation, after scoping.
Not yet in the catalogue — not orderable Talk to us about it →Traceability & animal identification (BDNI): matching
Your animal movements matched against the identification database, with correction sheets ready to verify. Outside the base: offered on quotation, after scoping.
Not yet in the catalogue — not orderable Talk to us about it →Need to go further?
These agents handle a different business process, with their own owner and their own price. They are added to this one.
Watch agent (competitors, press, regulation)
Defined sources, periodic summaries.
Watch agent (competitors, press, regulation) from 249 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →Compliance / regulatory control agent
Business rules, traceability.
Compliance / regulatory control agent from 371 € excl. VAT / month Discover the agent →
Does your need fall outside this?
Build your agent
In 30 minutes we identify the most relevant agent — without oversizing the project.
Demonstration
See the agent at work
5 everyday situations, taken from those that come up most often. Pick one: the exchange unfolds as it would in your organisation.
A scripted demonstration. These exchanges show how the agent behaves — its sources, its refusals, what it leaves to your teams. Nothing is sent from this page, no model is queried here, and the matters named are fictional. That is precisely what we promise your data. The behaviours shown here — monitoring, automation rules, routing and reminders — are configured with you during deployment, from your tools, your rules and your thresholds. The architecture points named in these exchanges — location, local execution, isolation, encryption, role-based access, logging — are not a guarantee attached to the demonstration: they are those of the architecture set out in your quotation, and verified before commissioning.
Farm assistant · hosted in France
Fictional simulation — not a client result
Four flags this morning, with no request from you.
· Three animal movements have no notification receipt on file. I can see them on your collection notes and in your livestock register; I cannot find the receipt from the identification body that closes them. The oldest is dated 22/07: if it is still to be notified, the seven-day window is nine days past. If you have already notified them from the portal without filing the receipt, tell me and I close all three.
· A plant-protection product invoice dated 04/08 has no matching entry in the register. Either the treatment did not happen, or it was not written down.
· Your sprayer's statutory inspection falls due in 34 days. The nearest centre is booked up to mid-October.
· Your professional liability certificate expires on 31/08, and the grant application under way requires it in date. morning-watch_4-flags.pdf4 flags · deadline and document
⛓ Source · livestock register, collection notes, notification receipts on file, spray register, invoices, holding deadlines
· Three animal movements have no notification receipt on file. I can see them on your collection notes and in your livestock register; I cannot find the receipt from the identification body that closes them. The oldest is dated 22/07: if it is still to be notified, the seven-day window is nine days past. If you have already notified them from the portal without filing the receipt, tell me and I close all three.
· A plant-protection product invoice dated 04/08 has no matching entry in the register. Either the treatment did not happen, or it was not written down.
· Your sprayer's statutory inspection falls due in 34 days. The nearest centre is booked up to mid-October.
· Your professional liability certificate expires on 31/08, and the grant application under way requires it in date. morning-watch_4-flags.pdf4 flags · deadline and document
⛓ Source · livestock register, collection notes, notification receipts on file, spray register, invoices, holding deadlines
The three movements — can you notify them?
I draw up the list, you notify from the portal. A notification binds the keeper: it carries your number and it stands as proof.
The three are not in the same situation, and that is what matters:
· Two are movements out to the same buyer, with the collection note on file. Everything is there: dates, tag numbers, destination. Ready to approve.
· The third is a movement in dated 22/07, and its accompanying document is missing. I do not invent it: without it, I know neither the exact origin nor the declared health status.
On the deadline I say what I can see and no more: none of the three has a receipt on file. If one was notified from the portal, it is in order and I close it without asking you for anything else. For those that remain, notifying now does not erase the delay, it stops the clock. That point heads the note, because discovering it during an inspection would be worse than reading it today.
The list of the three is ready, with the documents to gather for each — the third carries its empty box and the name of whoever holds the missing document. movements-to-notify_3.pdf3 movements · 1 missing document
✎ Support · 3 movements listed, documents to gather — notifying is yours
The three are not in the same situation, and that is what matters:
· Two are movements out to the same buyer, with the collection note on file. Everything is there: dates, tag numbers, destination. Ready to approve.
· The third is a movement in dated 22/07, and its accompanying document is missing. I do not invent it: without it, I know neither the exact origin nor the declared health status.
On the deadline I say what I can see and no more: none of the three has a receipt on file. If one was notified from the portal, it is in order and I close it without asking you for anything else. For those that remain, notifying now does not erase the delay, it stops the clock. That point heads the note, because discovering it during an inspection would be worse than reading it today.
The list of the three is ready, with the documents to gather for each — the third carries its empty box and the name of whoever holds the missing document. movements-to-notify_3.pdf3 movements · 1 missing document
✎ Support · 3 movements listed, documents to gather — notifying is yours
How did you spot all that? And who do you tell?
I watch, continuously, what you have opened to me: your registers, your invoices, the due dates of your equipment and certificates, and grant applications under way. A notification window running, an invoice with no entry, an inspection approaching, a certificate expiring — I say so, I do not wait to be asked.
On a farm the routing is shorter than elsewhere, and I do not pretend otherwise: it all comes back to you. What I can do is not send it all at once. Statutory deadlines in the morning, the rest on Friday. And where your accountant or your adviser has access to a subject, the flag goes to them directly — copied to you, never instead of you.
With a chase: 24 h on anything out of time, 7 days on the rest. And a monthly summary: what was flagged, what was done, what is still running. That is the document you produce on inspection day to show nothing was discovered on the day itself.
What this actually saves you: three movements listed with their documents instead of an evening of paperwork, a delay counter stopped today rather than discovered at inspection, a spray invoice of 04/08 matched against your register, an inspection slot for the sprayer booked before the centre fills up to mid-October, and a certificate renewed before 31/08 — meaning a grant application that does not stall on an out-of-date document.
The access is yours, and it is adjustable: opened document by document, logged, withdrawn on a word, and your field and livestock data do not leave the holding — local inference with the 100% Sovereign package; with the Agility and Serenity packages, data hosted in France, AI model called at its publisher except with the Sovereign model option. The portal does not talk to me: I see your documents and your receipts. That is what makes a movement with no receipt a question I put to you, never a breach I assert — and one word from you closes all three in a second.
Filing the declaration stays your signature, because it carries your number. Everything else is ready before you ask: the slot request to the inspection centre and the reminder to the insurer are written, for your signature, and the documents are filed into the grant application within minutes. Tell me what you open to me, and I give you your evenings back.
✎ Proposal · watch and chases to be configured — you set the thresholds
On a farm the routing is shorter than elsewhere, and I do not pretend otherwise: it all comes back to you. What I can do is not send it all at once. Statutory deadlines in the morning, the rest on Friday. And where your accountant or your adviser has access to a subject, the flag goes to them directly — copied to you, never instead of you.
With a chase: 24 h on anything out of time, 7 days on the rest. And a monthly summary: what was flagged, what was done, what is still running. That is the document you produce on inspection day to show nothing was discovered on the day itself.
What this actually saves you: three movements listed with their documents instead of an evening of paperwork, a delay counter stopped today rather than discovered at inspection, a spray invoice of 04/08 matched against your register, an inspection slot for the sprayer booked before the centre fills up to mid-October, and a certificate renewed before 31/08 — meaning a grant application that does not stall on an out-of-date document.
The access is yours, and it is adjustable: opened document by document, logged, withdrawn on a word, and your field and livestock data do not leave the holding — local inference with the 100% Sovereign package; with the Agility and Serenity packages, data hosted in France, AI model called at its publisher except with the Sovereign model option. The portal does not talk to me: I see your documents and your receipts. That is what makes a movement with no receipt a question I put to you, never a breach I assert — and one word from you closes all three in a second.
Filing the declaration stays your signature, because it carries your number. Everything else is ready before you ask: the slot request to the inspection centre and the reminder to the insurer are written, for your signature, and the documents are filed into the grant application within minutes. Tell me what you open to me, and I give you your evenings back.
✎ Proposal · watch and chases to be configured — you set the thresholds
And the January MSA income return — do you keep an eye on that too? VAT is done by my accounting centre.
It is on your calendar, and your checklists are ready.
MSA professional income return: deadline entered with its two reminders, at D-30 and D-7, and the checklist of the documents your accounting centre needs to prepare it — the result for the closed year, the contributions already called in, the grants notified over the year. Of the 9 documents on the list, 7 are already on file; the other 2 — the up-to-date MSA certificate and the statement of notified grants — are flagged to you today, not the day before.
VAT: simplified agricultural scheme, annual deadline entered on the same calendar, with the list of the quarter's 45 invoices matched against your purchases: 2 invoices with no intra-Community VAT number are flagged to your centre, which decides.
What this saves you: a file gathered before the deadline instead of a week hunting for documents in January — last year, 6 hours spent finding invoices; this year, 0, filing being done as you go.
If you want the returns to reach your centre pre-filled, that is an add-on quoted separately: here, the return stays prepared by your accounting centre and signed by you.
✎ Framework · deadlines, reminders and checklists — your accounting centre prepares, you sign
MSA professional income return: deadline entered with its two reminders, at D-30 and D-7, and the checklist of the documents your accounting centre needs to prepare it — the result for the closed year, the contributions already called in, the grants notified over the year. Of the 9 documents on the list, 7 are already on file; the other 2 — the up-to-date MSA certificate and the statement of notified grants — are flagged to you today, not the day before.
VAT: simplified agricultural scheme, annual deadline entered on the same calendar, with the list of the quarter's 45 invoices matched against your purchases: 2 invoices with no intra-Community VAT number are flagged to your centre, which decides.
What this saves you: a file gathered before the deadline instead of a week hunting for documents in January — last year, 6 hours spent finding invoices; this year, 0, filing being done as you go.
If you want the returns to reach your centre pre-filled, that is an add-on quoted separately: here, the return stays prepared by your accounting centre and signed by you.
✎ Framework · deadlines, reminders and checklists — your accounting centre prepares, you sign
Fictional simulation — not a client result
Give me a state of my registers before the end of the season.
Spray register: 84 operations recorded this season. I have matched them against your 31 product invoices and your field records.
Three kinds of gap, and they do not call for the same thing:
· 7 operations with no exact field named — "bottom of the Combe" appears seven times, and your records hold three parcels under that name. It is not serious, it is unreadable; on inspection, unreadable is treated as absent.
· 2 treatments recorded after the date of the matching purchase invoice. One is a day out, the other eleven. The first is a typing error; the second, I do not know.
· 1 product invoiced on 04/08 with no entry at all.
What I have not done: filled the seven field names by picking the most likely parcel. A register filled with the most likely is a false register, and it carries your signature. registers_10-gaps.pdf84 operations · 10 gaps, kind stated
⛓ Source · spray register, purchase invoices, field records
Three kinds of gap, and they do not call for the same thing:
· 7 operations with no exact field named — "bottom of the Combe" appears seven times, and your records hold three parcels under that name. It is not serious, it is unreadable; on inspection, unreadable is treated as absent.
· 2 treatments recorded after the date of the matching purchase invoice. One is a day out, the other eleven. The first is a typing error; the second, I do not know.
· 1 product invoiced on 04/08 with no entry at all.
What I have not done: filled the seven field names by picking the most likely parcel. A register filled with the most likely is a false register, and it carries your signature. registers_10-gaps.pdf84 operations · 10 gaps, kind stated
⛓ Source · spray register, purchase invoices, field records
The 04/08 product — I did apply it. I must have forgotten to write it down.
Then the entry is ready to complete, and all that is missing is what only you know: the field, the dose actually applied, the date and time, and the conditions at the time of the pass.
I pre-fill none of those four, not even the ones I could approximate — the invoice gives a quantity purchased, not a dose applied, and confusing the two would manufacture an entry that is plausible and false.
A point of method, since it holds for the future: an entry made after the event remains a valid entry, provided it is truthful. What is not truthful is an entry reconstructed from an invoice.
A proposal, if you approve it: with every product invoice, a blank entry form opens in your name, with the product reference and purchase date already filled. You are reminded after 48 h if it is still blank, and it appears in the monthly summary for as long as it stays that way.
It never fills itself. The point is not to save you from filling it, it is to save you from forgetting it exists.
And the register exports at any time in a machine-readable, time-stamped format, with its 84 lines and their documents: that is the file you hand over at an inspection, and it carries the date of every entry. entry-form_04-08.pdf4 fields to fill · nothing assumed
✎ Proposal · a form opens with every purchase — never pre-filled
I pre-fill none of those four, not even the ones I could approximate — the invoice gives a quantity purchased, not a dose applied, and confusing the two would manufacture an entry that is plausible and false.
A point of method, since it holds for the future: an entry made after the event remains a valid entry, provided it is truthful. What is not truthful is an entry reconstructed from an invoice.
A proposal, if you approve it: with every product invoice, a blank entry form opens in your name, with the product reference and purchase date already filled. You are reminded after 48 h if it is still blank, and it appears in the monthly summary for as long as it stays that way.
It never fills itself. The point is not to save you from filling it, it is to save you from forgetting it exists.
And the register exports at any time in a machine-readable, time-stamped format, with its 84 lines and their documents: that is the file you hand over at an inspection, and it carries the date of every entry. entry-form_04-08.pdf4 fields to fill · nothing assumed
✎ Proposal · a form opens with every purchase — never pre-filled
And cross-compliance — would my file hold up in an inspection?
I do not say whether it holds: I check its consistency, point by point, and I say what is there and what is missing. The list of expected cross-compliance items (BCAE) is read in its dated version, never from memory.
· Document present — 11 items: parcel register up to date, this season's plant-protection register, product invoices matched, last season's fertilisation plan.
· Document missing — 2 items: the sprayer inspection certificate, due in 34 days, and this season's fertilisation plan.
· Point to check — 1: the share of the main crop across your utilised agricultural area since the switch from barley to sunflower — the rule is checked on your final cropping plan, not the provisional one.
What this gives you in practice: a list of 14 items, each with the document that proves it or the name of whoever holds it, in the order an inspector will read it. The compliance assessment rests with the inspector and your adviser; what I spare you is discovering on the day a document that had been missing for three months.
The consistency check runs every Monday, and a document that expires is flagged to you the day it does.
⛓ Sourced · list of expected items (dated version), your documents, parcel register, cropping plan
· Document present — 11 items: parcel register up to date, this season's plant-protection register, product invoices matched, last season's fertilisation plan.
· Document missing — 2 items: the sprayer inspection certificate, due in 34 days, and this season's fertilisation plan.
· Point to check — 1: the share of the main crop across your utilised agricultural area since the switch from barley to sunflower — the rule is checked on your final cropping plan, not the provisional one.
What this gives you in practice: a list of 14 items, each with the document that proves it or the name of whoever holds it, in the order an inspector will read it. The compliance assessment rests with the inspector and your adviser; what I spare you is discovering on the day a document that had been missing for three months.
The consistency check runs every Monday, and a document that expires is flagged to you the day it does.
⛓ Sourced · list of expected items (dated version), your documents, parcel register, cropping plan
Fictional simulation — not a client result
Three cows have been coughing for two days. I have antibiotic left from last time — can I give it to them?
No, and I am not going to tell you to wait either: I do not give a view.
What you are asking is a veterinary act. It does not turn on anything I could read in your registers, but on what a vet observes on the animals.
Two things I can say, and they are in your data:
· The antibiotic you mention was prescribed on 12/03 for two named animals, neither of which is among today's three.
· The withdrawal period for that product is 28 days for milk, and you deliver every other day. That is a management fact, not a treatment opinion — and it would hit your collection immediately.
I have prepared the call: your vet's number, the three tag numbers, the date the signs appeared, and a recall of the herd's two treatments since January. You pick up the phone, they decide. vet-call-sheet.pdf3 animals · herd history
⛓ Source · prescription of 12/03, treatment register, collection schedule
What you are asking is a veterinary act. It does not turn on anything I could read in your registers, but on what a vet observes on the animals.
Two things I can say, and they are in your data:
· The antibiotic you mention was prescribed on 12/03 for two named animals, neither of which is among today's three.
· The withdrawal period for that product is 28 days for milk, and you deliver every other day. That is a management fact, not a treatment opinion — and it would hit your collection immediately.
I have prepared the call: your vet's number, the three tag numbers, the date the signs appeared, and a recall of the herd's two treatments since January. You pick up the phone, they decide. vet-call-sheet.pdf3 animals · herd history
⛓ Source · prescription of 12/03, treatment register, collection schedule
It is just a cough, and the vet will not come before Thursday.
I understand the constraint, and it does not change my answer. This is not caution on principle: an antibiotic given without a prescription for those animals means a treatment not covered by any prescription, a withdrawal period never started in your register, and milk delivered under a period nobody has counted.
The risk is not theoretical, it is on collection: a non-conformity on a bulk tank costs far more than three animals.
What I can usefully do, right now: your vet offers a same-day remote consultation for urgent cases in their area — it is written into the herd health plan you signed in January, page 2. I have pulled the page.
And one observation, because it goes beyond today: this is the third time this year a treatment has been considered off leftover prescriptions. I can keep the inventory of your medicine cabinet — product, animals named on the prescription, expiry date, withdrawal periods — and flag what will expire before it is used.
An inventory prescribes nothing. It only makes visible what is left, and who it was prescribed for.
✎ Support · same-day remote consultation — the decision stays with the vet
The risk is not theoretical, it is on collection: a non-conformity on a bulk tank costs far more than three animals.
What I can usefully do, right now: your vet offers a same-day remote consultation for urgent cases in their area — it is written into the herd health plan you signed in January, page 2. I have pulled the page.
And one observation, because it goes beyond today: this is the third time this year a treatment has been considered off leftover prescriptions. I can keep the inventory of your medicine cabinet — product, animals named on the prescription, expiry date, withdrawal periods — and flag what will expire before it is used.
An inventory prescribes nothing. It only makes visible what is left, and who it was prescribed for.
✎ Support · same-day remote consultation — the decision stays with the vet
Fictional simulation — not a client result
A line in your spray record has been waiting since Tuesday's job, and it has not been filled in for you.
What I see: the agricultural contractor sprayed 11 ha on Grandes Terres on Tuesday. Their invoice has arrived, with the product and the quantity delivered; your record has nothing for that date, and their operator's job sheet is not on your file.
This kind of case had not yet been taken into account: your record expects one line per job with its parcel, its rate and its conditions, and nothing in it says what counts when it was not you holding the boom. So I have recorded nothing — and the 11 ha are identified, with their date.
Three ways forward. Record nothing and rely on the contractor's own register: they did the spraying, and at an inspection it is your record that is asked for. Copy the line from their invoice: the record is complete in two minutes, and a quantity delivered is not a rate applied — exactly what you told me never to do for the 04/08 product. Ask for their job sheet — parcel, rate, date, time, conditions — and record it as it stands, in their operator's name: your record carries a truthful entry and its author, at the cost of one document to ask for at every job.
I recommend the third. An entry made after the event stays valid as long as it is truthful, and the truth comes from whoever held the boom. An invoice says what was delivered; it does not say what was applied, nor where, nor in what conditions.
You can also give me another rule of your own — for instance: the contractor's sheet is filed as it stands as an exhibit to the record, with no copying, and your record refers to it by its reference.
Shall I remember it for the next jobs? Of your 84 spray jobs this season, 12 were carried out by a contractor, and none carries a job sheet on your file. If you approve the rule, I will ask for it with every invoice, and each Friday I will tell you which ones are still missing.
⛓ Source · job of 08/08 on Grandes Terres, contractor's invoice, spray record (84 jobs), parcel register
What I see: the agricultural contractor sprayed 11 ha on Grandes Terres on Tuesday. Their invoice has arrived, with the product and the quantity delivered; your record has nothing for that date, and their operator's job sheet is not on your file.
This kind of case had not yet been taken into account: your record expects one line per job with its parcel, its rate and its conditions, and nothing in it says what counts when it was not you holding the boom. So I have recorded nothing — and the 11 ha are identified, with their date.
Three ways forward. Record nothing and rely on the contractor's own register: they did the spraying, and at an inspection it is your record that is asked for. Copy the line from their invoice: the record is complete in two minutes, and a quantity delivered is not a rate applied — exactly what you told me never to do for the 04/08 product. Ask for their job sheet — parcel, rate, date, time, conditions — and record it as it stands, in their operator's name: your record carries a truthful entry and its author, at the cost of one document to ask for at every job.
I recommend the third. An entry made after the event stays valid as long as it is truthful, and the truth comes from whoever held the boom. An invoice says what was delivered; it does not say what was applied, nor where, nor in what conditions.
You can also give me another rule of your own — for instance: the contractor's sheet is filed as it stands as an exhibit to the record, with no copying, and your record refers to it by its reference.
Shall I remember it for the next jobs? Of your 84 spray jobs this season, 12 were carried out by a contractor, and none carries a job sheet on your file. If you approve the rule, I will ask for it with every invoice, and each Friday I will tell you which ones are still missing.
⛓ Source · job of 08/08 on Grandes Terres, contractor's invoice, spray record (84 jobs), parcel register
The third. But ask for it at the quotation stage, not after the job — afterwards we chase it for three weeks. And yes, keep it.
Written exactly as you just said it, and it carries your correction.
The rule, in one sentence: a job carried out by a third party is recorded from their job sheet, in the name of the operator who signed it; the sheet is asked for at the quotation stage, not after the job; and no rate is ever taken from an invoice.
Why your correction matters more than it looks: I measured it on the 3 sheets you did eventually obtain last year: 2 chasers and 11 days on average. Asked for at the quotation stage, the sheet arrives with the invoice, and there is nothing left to chase.
What it changes right now: the request for Tuesday's job sheet is written and ready to go, and the line to add to your standard order form is drafted — one sentence, for your accountancy centre to review before the next quotation.
What lets you undo it: the rule is written into your record-keeping rules under its own name, with its date and the job that gave rise to it. You remove one line, and these jobs go back to waiting for an entry in your own hand.
✎ Rule approved · record-keeping rules, entry “job carried out by a third party”, approved on 11/08
The rule, in one sentence: a job carried out by a third party is recorded from their job sheet, in the name of the operator who signed it; the sheet is asked for at the quotation stage, not after the job; and no rate is ever taken from an invoice.
Why your correction matters more than it looks: I measured it on the 3 sheets you did eventually obtain last year: 2 chasers and 11 days on average. Asked for at the quotation stage, the sheet arrives with the invoice, and there is nothing left to chase.
What it changes right now: the request for Tuesday's job sheet is written and ready to go, and the line to add to your standard order form is drafted — one sentence, for your accountancy centre to review before the next quotation.
What lets you undo it: the rule is written into your record-keeping rules under its own name, with its date and the job that gave rise to it. You remove one line, and these jobs go back to waiting for an entry in your own hand.
✎ Rule approved · record-keeping rules, entry “job carried out by a third party”, approved on 11/08
The 12 contractor jobs this season — how do they look in the record?
I have gone back over them one by one, and there is more to take from them than an end-of-season catch-up.
What I looked at: the 12 jobs carried out by the contractor, the matching line in your record where one exists, and the invoice that goes with it.
What comes out of it: 9 appear in the record with nothing but the invoiced quantity, 3 do not appear at all, and on 4 of the 9 a single line covers two parcels — the invoice does not tell them apart.
What that represents, and it is what makes the rule useful straight away: those 12 jobs cover 41 ha, that is 34% of your sprayed area. At an inspection, a line covering two parcels reads like the seven “bas de la Combe” entries — unreadable rather than absent, and unreadable is treated as absent.
What I propose, and it is one line to add to your order form: that the operator's job sheet be due with the invoice, parcel by parcel. I file it, I record it as it stands, and your record becomes readable again without you having to reconstruct anything.
What it is worth: the 4 two-parcel lines split by themselves as soon as the sheet arrives — 4 corrections of 6 minutes each instead of the end-of-season reconstruction you put at half a day last year. And the 3 jobs with no line get theirs back, with its author.
The decision is yours: it is your order form and your relationship with the contractor, and I do not touch it before you have written it.
✎ Proposal · 12 contractor jobs, 41 ha or 34% of the sprayed area, 9 lines from invoices, 3 missing, 4 lines covering two parcels — the order form belongs to the farmer
What I looked at: the 12 jobs carried out by the contractor, the matching line in your record where one exists, and the invoice that goes with it.
What comes out of it: 9 appear in the record with nothing but the invoiced quantity, 3 do not appear at all, and on 4 of the 9 a single line covers two parcels — the invoice does not tell them apart.
What that represents, and it is what makes the rule useful straight away: those 12 jobs cover 41 ha, that is 34% of your sprayed area. At an inspection, a line covering two parcels reads like the seven “bas de la Combe” entries — unreadable rather than absent, and unreadable is treated as absent.
What I propose, and it is one line to add to your order form: that the operator's job sheet be due with the invoice, parcel by parcel. I file it, I record it as it stands, and your record becomes readable again without you having to reconstruct anything.
What it is worth: the 4 two-parcel lines split by themselves as soon as the sheet arrives — 4 corrections of 6 minutes each instead of the end-of-season reconstruction you put at half a day last year. And the 3 jobs with no line get theirs back, with its author.
The decision is yours: it is your order form and your relationship with the contractor, and I do not touch it before you have written it.
✎ Proposal · 12 contractor jobs, 41 ha or 34% of the sprayed area, 9 lines from invoices, 3 missing, 4 lines covering two parcels — the order form belongs to the farmer
Fictional simulation — not a client result
I want to put together a grant application for the storage building. Where do I start?
With whatever would make you ineligible, because that is what surfaces latest.
Two blocking points, and they do not weigh the same:
· No spending may be committed before the application is acknowledged. You have a quote signed on 18/07 with Bertrand Matériaux. A signed quote can count as starting work — that is the point to settle before anything else, and it cannot be fixed afterwards.
· Your professional liability certificate expires on 31/08, and the application requires it in date at filing.
Three non-blocking points to prepare: the funding plan, the social-scheme certificate, and the two competing quotes the scheme requires above a certain amount.
What I rely on for eligibility on the merits: the text of the current call, never my memory. The selection criteria are regional and change from one call to the next — the link and its publication date are in the attachment, and I set your file against it point by point as soon as you ask. The eligibility decision itself rests with the assessing authority. grant_blocking-points.pdf2 blocking · 3 to prepare
⛓ Source · your administrative documents, quotes, current call for projects
Two blocking points, and they do not weigh the same:
· No spending may be committed before the application is acknowledged. You have a quote signed on 18/07 with Bertrand Matériaux. A signed quote can count as starting work — that is the point to settle before anything else, and it cannot be fixed afterwards.
· Your professional liability certificate expires on 31/08, and the application requires it in date at filing.
Three non-blocking points to prepare: the funding plan, the social-scheme certificate, and the two competing quotes the scheme requires above a certain amount.
What I rely on for eligibility on the merits: the text of the current call, never my memory. The selection criteria are regional and change from one call to the next — the link and its publication date are in the attachment, and I set your file against it point by point as soon as you ask. The eligibility decision itself rests with the assessing authority. grant_blocking-points.pdf2 blocking · 3 to prepare
⛓ Source · your administrative documents, quotes, current call for projects
The signed quote — is that serious?
I do not label it, and here is why that is the right answer rather than a soft one.
What matters is not whether a signed quote "generally" causes a problem: it is what your call for projects says, and what the case officer accepts in your region. Both can be asked, and are asked before filing.
What I can establish: the quote is dated 18/07, it carries your signature, it shows no deposit and no priced acceptance, and no payment has left. Those four facts are what the case officer will look at — I gather them, I do not interpret them.
The question is written, ready to go to the grant office, with those four facts and the quote attached. A question asked before filing costs a week; the same question after costs the application.
A proposal for what follows: I can flag any signed quote on an item that might fall within a grant scheme, before a payment leaves. A flag, not a block: you sign what you like, you simply know it as you do. grant-office-question_quote.pdf4 established facts · quote attached
✎ Action · question to the grant office ready — the answer is not guessed
What matters is not whether a signed quote "generally" causes a problem: it is what your call for projects says, and what the case officer accepts in your region. Both can be asked, and are asked before filing.
What I can establish: the quote is dated 18/07, it carries your signature, it shows no deposit and no priced acceptance, and no payment has left. Those four facts are what the case officer will look at — I gather them, I do not interpret them.
The question is written, ready to go to the grant office, with those four facts and the quote attached. A question asked before filing costs a week; the same question after costs the application.
A proposal for what follows: I can flag any signed quote on an item that might fall within a grant scheme, before a payment leaves. A flag, not a block: you sign what you like, you simply know it as you do. grant-office-question_quote.pdf4 established facts · quote attached
✎ Action · question to the grant office ready — the answer is not guessed
Data hosted in France · sovereign model as an option
Your case is not here? That is exactly what a 30-minute conversation is for. Discuss your project →
How it works
The stages of your AI agent project
1
Audit & scoping
30 minutes to target the use case with the best return.
2
Quote or direct sign-up
A catalogue offer is bought online; a specific need gets a costed quote.
3
Design
We design the agent and its guardrails.
4
Integration & testing
We connect your tools to the agent, which is itself hosted in France.
5
Rollout
Going live and training your team.
6
Operation
Continuous supervision and improvement.
The context
Why AI matters to farm businesses — and why they hesitate
Farming is first and foremost in the field and in the barn. Yet declarations, registers, compliance and grant applications absorb a growing amount of time — on data (parcels, finances, livestock) that is among the most strategic the farm holds.
! The issue
The farmer is caught between an administrative load that keeps growing (CAP and MSA deadlines, the plant-protection register, cross-compliance, grants) and time in the field that is counted. Yet most consumer AI tools amount to entrusting parcels, yields, income and livestock data to a third party, often hosted outside Europe and subject to the Cloud Act.
✓ Our answer
AI is only of interest to a farm if it is sovereign and confidential by design. Local inference or an isolated resource hosted in France, systematic human oversight, the decision reserved for the farmer: time gained on paperwork is never paid for in lost confidentiality. The aim is not to replace the farmer or their adviser, but to give them back time on the farm.
The decisive point
Confidentiality of farm data: sovereignty & compliance
A farm handles strategic data: parcels, yields, finances, livestock. Here is how the architecture of our agents protects it, farm by farm.
Local inference
With the 100% Sovereign package, the agent runs on a machine at the farm: no data leaves the network, nothing passes through a cloud.
Hosting in France
Otherwise, with the Agility and Serenity packages, a dedicated, isolated resource hosted in France, under French law: data hosted in France; the AI model is called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option.
Reduced extraterritorial exposure
As regards farm data, exposure to the Cloud Act and FISA 702 is reduced by design; location alone does not guarantee immunity.
A resource isolated per farm
No pooling of data: an environment strictly dedicated to your farm.
Encryption & controlled access
Encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access (RBAC), strong authentication and logging.
AI Act: governed deployment
The agent carries out what you have authorised; no declaration filed on your behalf; traceability and human oversight from end to end.
What depends on the architecture chosen These points are not general guarantees: they are settled deployment by deployment, in the quotation.
- The applicable location is that of the architecture set out in the quotation and verified before commissioning.
- Local execution is announced only for the configuration explicitly described and accepted in the quotation.
- The applicable isolation depends on the deployment mode set out in the quotation; no dedicated isolation is presumed.
- The encryption mechanisms in transit and at rest, their components and key management are those documented for the architecture chosen.
- Roles and permissions are configured and accepted for the identities and systems actually connected.
- The events logged, their content, their retention period and who may access them are defined for the deployment chosen.
For the most sensitive data, SecNumCloud and HDS options are available depending on your requirements. A single architecture is designed to answer both the GDPR and extraterritorial exposure. Designed for deployment in line with the GDPR and the AI Act, after the processing, roles and context-specific risks have been assessed.
The gain
How much time can an operations team win back?
By keeping your deadlines, checking your documents and preparing your applications and your register, a farm can aim for a clear reduction in administrative time — reinvested in the crops, the herd and running the farm.
Preparing a grant application (investment, agri-environmental)
Updating the pesticide & parcel registers
Checking the cross-compliance file before an inspection
Qualitative, non-contractual comparison: the proportions shown illustrate the shift of the work towards review, they represent no measurement. Every output of the agent is reviewed and approved by a competent person.
Indicative estimate, to be confirmed by a pilot on your real files (general terms of sale, article 4).
Our commitment
Four guarantees that matter to a farm
With 100% Sovereign, farm data never leaves your premisesData hosted in France on an isolated resource; the AI model is called at its publisher, except with the Sovereign model option. With that option, no parcel or livestock data entrusted to a foreign third party.
Data in France, under French lawFor farm data: hosting under French law, native minimisation, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity.
The farmer keeps the decisionThe agent prepares lists, registers and applications that can be checked; no declaration is filed on your behalf and you remain responsible.
Human oversight & traceabilityFor every document check and every application prepared: systematic logging and human review, in line with the AI Act.
Frequently asked questions
Your questions, our answers
Does the agent make the declarations for me?
No. It keeps your calendar, checks your documents, prepares your grant applications and your plant-protection register; you file yourself on the official portals and remain responsible. Pre-filling the CAP and MSA declarations is not included in this agent: it is offered on quotation.
Does it give binding regulatory advice?
It informs, alerts and summarises the applicable rules, with the sources to back them up, but it does not stand in for your adviser, the chamber of agriculture or your farm accounting centre.
What happens to the needs that are not included?
Preparing the CAP online declaration, pre-filling the MSA and VAT returns and matching against the BDNI are not part of the base: they are scoped with you and quoted separately, with no online ordering. Agronomic support for production is not offered.
Is my farm data protected?
Yes: hosting in France, an isolated resource, access recorded. Your parcel, financial and livestock data stays confidential, architecture designed to reduce exposure to extraterritorial legislation, location alone not being enough to guarantee immunity.
How do you talk to the agent from the farm?
From the tools you already have, including out in the field: WhatsApp Business, email and your website chat for direct sales,. If you work with employees or a co-operative team, the agent is also reachable from Microsoft Teams or Slack. No app to install, no account for your customers to create. These connections rest on open standards, including the MCP protocol, and are included in every plan, at no extra cost, within the number of connections set out in your agent's quote; the catalogue grows without a surcharge. Only the fees charged by third-party platforms — WhatsApp Business bills per conversation — are passed on to you at cost, without margin, outside the subscription. You keep oversight from a web dashboard.
Can a chamber of agriculture or a co-operative offer it to its members?
Yes. The offer is aimed at individual farmers and farming partnerships, but also at chambers of agriculture, co-operatives and farm accounting centres that want to offer an AI assistant to their members, on a business-to-business-to-consumer model.
How long does it take to deploy an agent?
A few weeks as a rule, after a 30-minute meeting with our sales team that identifies the most valuable use, then a phase of design, integration and testing before going live and getting you up to speed.
Related industries
Other professions and organisations that are equipping themselves
Let's talk
Let's size up the potential on your farm
30 minutes to identify what will give you back the most time — hosted in France, supervised, with no commitment.